首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同土方测量方法的比较与评价
引用本文:林观土.不同土方测量方法的比较与评价[J].广东农业科学,2007(8):33-35.
作者姓名:林观土
作者单位:华南农业大学信息学院,广东,广州,510642
摘    要:对土方量的测量计算方法进行对比和评价,结果表明:在方格法、等高线法、断面法和DEM法等4种方法中以DEM法的计算精度最好,利用全站仪采集数据、DEM法计算土方量是目前精度最高和速度最快的测量方法,适合于任何地形的土方测量;经纬仪测量适合于精度要求不高的丘陵地区的土方测量;水准仪测量地面高程的精度较高,野外测量简单、成本低,适合于平坦地形的土方测量.

关 键 词:土方测量与计算  精度  评价
文章编号:1004-874X(2007)08-0033-03
修稿时间:2007-05-10

A comparative evaluation of several methods for earthwork volume measurement
LIN Guan-tu.A comparative evaluation of several methods for earthwork volume measurement[J].Guangdong Agricultural Sciences,2007(8):33-35.
Authors:LIN Guan-tu
Institution:College oflnformatics, South China Agricultual University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Abstract:In this paper, three most frequently used methods for the earthwork volume measure was analyzed using the law of error propogation. The results showed that among the four methods for the earthwork count, the pricision of DEM method is the best. So far, the combination of the total station for data collection and DEM method for the earthwork count was the best precistion and time efficiency, and was applicable to any kind of terrian. Theodolite was suitable for measuring in the hilly area with not high requirement of the precision. Leveling method was suitable for the even terrian for its better precision, simple operation and cost-efficiency.
Keywords:earthwork volume and count  precision  evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《广东农业科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《广东农业科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号