首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Five years of REDD+ governance: The use of market mechanisms as a response to anthropogenic climate change
Institution:1. Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, 4111, Queensland, Australia;2. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia;3. International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan;4. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan;1. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland;2. Viikki Tropical Resources Institute (VITRI), Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland;3. Department of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Finland;4. Department of Environmental Science & Policy, George Mason University, USA, Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands;1. University of Southern Queensland (USQ), Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia;2. Vietnamese Academy of Forest Science (VAFS), Vietnam;3. Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture & Rural Development (IPSARD), Vietnam
Abstract:Forest ecosystems worldwide are increasingly subjected to human intervention, leading commentators to argue that forests should be viewed as anthropogenic ecosystems. REDD+ is an emerging inter-governmental policy instrument aimed at both reducing deforestation and forest degradation and combatting climate change, whereby developed countries pay developing countries to reduce their forest-based emissions. The paper details a five-year research project to evaluate REDD+ quality of governance and develop governance standards for the mechanism. Quality of governance was evaluated in five key international institutional elements: the REDD + related negotiations in the global climate talks; the support and funding agencies UN-REDD, Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), Forest Investment Programme (FIP) and the REDD + Partnership. This research was complemented by national level governance assessments and related standards setting initiatives in Nepal and Papua New Guinea. The researchers conclude that REDD+ confronts a number of challenges, notably around resources for capacity building, and benefit sharing. In addition, the lack of provisions for changing behaviour and solving the problem of forest-based emissions in the current safeguards render them inadequate to the task of delivering quality of governance. In the absence of consistent governance standards, REDD + will only partially be successful in combatting climate change in the Anthropocene.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号