首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

肃南、肃北草地类型及草地植物物种多样性现状
引用本文:赵忠,何毅,李青,杨鹏翼,金赐福,杨学兰,孙晓云,顾自林,张卫军,王军,屈勇,柴永青,泽德,那·巴特尔.肃南、肃北草地类型及草地植物物种多样性现状[J].草业学报,2010,19(5):227-238.
作者姓名:赵忠  何毅  李青  杨鹏翼  金赐福  杨学兰  孙晓云  顾自林  张卫军  王军  屈勇  柴永青  泽德  那·巴特尔
作者单位:1.甘肃省草原监理站,甘肃 兰州 730046;2.甘肃省外资项目办公室,甘肃 兰州 730030;3.肃南县草原监理所,甘肃 肃南 734400;4.肃北县草原监理站,甘肃 肃北 736300
基金项目:甘肃省全球环境基金(GEF)项目"牧区草地资源及生物多样性调查" 
摘    要:“草场类型和草地植物资源调查”于2007-2008年在甘肃省肃南裕固族自治县和肃北蒙古族自治县实施。调查共测定草本植被样方226个,灌丛植被样方125个,草灌乔植被样方32个;现场标图约22500km2,调查路线长18500km。按照《中国草地类型的划分标准和中国草地类型分类系统》确定肃南县草地类型有9类、18个亚类、24组、29型;肃北县草地类型有9类、17个亚类、19组、29型;采集植物标本986份381种,分属53科,176属;其中牧草类植物300种。肃北、肃南草场的总体状况在退化,局部地方保护较好;除气候因素外,超载过牧是加速草场退化的主要原因,其次为鼠害;蝗虫不是造成草场植被退化的原因。调查区草地植物的物种多样性没有遭到大的破坏,但各种群的优势度变化较大,表明群落中种群关系已经发生了变化,生物多样性受到威胁。

关 键 词:肃南肃北  草地类型  物种多样性  现状
收稿时间:1900-01-01;

The present situation of grassland and plant diversity in Sunan and Subei county
ZHAO Zhong,HE Yi,LI Qing,YANG Peng-yi,JIN Ci-fu,YANG Xue-lan,SUN Xiao-yun,GU Zi-lin,ZHANG Wei-jun,WANG Jun,QU Yong,CHAI Yong-qing,ZE De,NA Bater.The present situation of grassland and plant diversity in Sunan and Subei county[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2010,19(5):227-238.
Authors:ZHAO Zhong  HE Yi  LI Qing  YANG Peng-yi  JIN Ci-fu  YANG Xue-lan  SUN Xiao-yun  GU Zi-lin  ZHANG Wei-jun  WANG Jun  QU Yong  CHAI Yong-qing  ZE De  NA Bater
Institution:1.Gansu Provincial Grassland Supervision Station, Lanzhou 730046, China; 2.Foreign Fund Project Management Office of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730030, China; 3.Sunan County Grassland Supervision Station, Sunan 734400, China; 4.Subei County Grassland Supervision Station, Subei 736300, China
Abstract:Investigation on grassland sorts and grassland plant resource was carried out in Sunan Yuguor and Subei Mongolian Autonomous County, Gansu province in 2007-2008. 226 grass quadrates, 125 shrub quadrates, and 32 mixture quadrates were tested; 22 500 km2 of investigation area were labeled on the topographic map. The investigation route was 185 000 km. According to the “Chinese Grassland Divisional Criteria and Chinese Grassland Classification System”, It was sure that the grassland in Sunan county embraced 29 types of 24 forms belonged to 18 subclasses in 9 classes, respectively; and the grassland in Subei county were 29 types of 19 forms from 17 subclasses in 9 classes. 986 plant samples of 381 species from 176 genera of 53 families were collected. Among the plants, 300 species were forage grass. The general situation of grassland in Sunan and Subei counties was degradation. Partial area is preserved well; beside climate factor, overgrazing is the key cause that induced the grassland degradation; the next reason is the rodent damage. Grasshopper is not the cause bringing grassland degradation. The species diversity of grassland plant in the investigation area has not been destroyed greatly. However, the species dominance in the plant community had a large variation, which shows that the change of species relation in the community has already taken place. The biodiversity is suffering threat.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《草业学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《草业学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号