首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

寒亭区主要甜樱桃品种果实品质比较研究
引用本文:刘英,雒新艳,谭延庆,黄翠香,杨珍珍,刘辉芳. 寒亭区主要甜樱桃品种果实品质比较研究[J]. 北方果树, 2021, 0(2): 10-13. DOI: 10.16376/j.cnki.bfgs.2021.02.003
作者姓名:刘英  雒新艳  谭延庆  黄翠香  杨珍珍  刘辉芳
作者单位:潍坊职业学院,山东潍坊 261041;潍坊职业学院,山东潍坊 261041;潍坊市寒亭区农业农村局农村能源办公室,山东潍坊 261100;潍坊市临朐县农村能源开发利用中心,山东潍坊262600;潍坊职业学院,山东潍坊 261041;河北政法职业学院,石家庄 050000
基金项目:2019年度山东省重点研发计划(公益类科技攻关)2019GNC106156
摘    要:作者以当地种植合作社主栽的8个甜樱桃品种‘红灯’‘美早’‘布鲁克斯’‘萨米脱’‘黄蜜’‘先锋’‘雷尼’‘拉宾斯’为试验材料,分析测定其单果重、硬度、可食率、出汁率、可溶性固形物含量、总酸含量、总糖含量、维生素C含量及固酸比9项指标。结果表明,8个甜樱桃品种均能在寒亭区开花结实,且坐果率高,果实品质好,产量高,经济效益好。各品种之间果实品质存在差异:单果重,‘萨米脱’‘美早’表现突出,‘先锋’‘拉宾斯’果较小;可食率,‘萨米脱’‘美早’‘布鲁克斯’‘雷尼’‘红灯’均表现突出,‘黄蜜’最低;出汁率,‘美早’‘红灯’‘萨米脱’‘黄蜜’‘雷尼’均表现突出,‘布鲁克斯’最低;果实硬度,‘布鲁克斯’‘先锋’‘美早’高,‘雷尼’‘黄蜜’低;可溶性固形物含量,‘美早’‘红灯’‘萨米脱’高,‘雷尼’‘黄蜜’低。供试的8个甜樱桃品种均表现较好,可在寒亭区种植,‘美早’‘红灯’‘萨米脱’综合性状表现好于其他品种,可重点推广;‘先锋’综合表现略差,‘布鲁克斯’裂果较明显,不建议扩大推广。

关 键 词:寒亭区  大樱桃  种植表现

Comparative Study on Fruit Quality of Main Sweet Cherry Varieties in Hanting District
LIU Ying,LUO Xin-yan,TAN Yan-qing,HUANG Cui-xiang,YANG Zhen-zhen,LIU Hui-fang. Comparative Study on Fruit Quality of Main Sweet Cherry Varieties in Hanting District[J]. Northern Fruits, 2021, 0(2): 10-13. DOI: 10.16376/j.cnki.bfgs.2021.02.003
Authors:LIU Ying  LUO Xin-yan  TAN Yan-qing  HUANG Cui-xiang  YANG Zhen-zhen  LIU Hui-fang
Affiliation:(Weifang vocational college,Weifang Shandong 261041,China;Rural Energy Office of Agricultural and Rural Bureau,Hanting District,Weifang Shandong 261100,China;Weifang Linqu County Rural energy development and utilization Center,Weifang Shandong 262600,China;Hebei Vocational College of Politics and Law,Shijiazhuang 050000,China)
Abstract:Eight sweet cherry varieties‘Red Light’‘Mezao’‘Brooks’‘Samit’‘Yellow Honey’‘Pioneer’‘Renee’and‘Rabins’were used as experimental materials.The author in the local planting cooperatives analysis to determine the weight,hardness,edible rate,juice yield,soluble solids content,total acid content,total sugar content,vitamin C content and solid acid than 9 indicators.The results showed that all the 8 sweet cherry varieties were able to blossom and bear fruit with high fruit-setting rate,good fruit quality,high yield and good economic benefits in Hanting District.There were differences in fruit quality among varieties.In the aspect of single fruit weight,‘Samit’‘Mezao’were performed well,‘Pioneer’‘Rabins’did poorlyl;The edible rate of‘Samit’‘Mezao’‘Brooks’‘Renee’and‘Red Light’were all outstanding,and‘Yellow Honey’was the lowest;The juice yield,‘Mezao’‘Red Light’‘Samit’‘Yellow Honey’and‘Renny’all had outstanding performance,and‘Brooks’had the lowest;The fruit firmness of‘Brooks’‘Pioneer’and‘Mezao’was high,while that of‘Renny’and‘Yellow Honey’were low.The content of soluble solids was higher in‘Mezao’‘Red Light’‘Samit’and lower in‘Renee’and‘Yellow Honey’.All the 8 sweet cherry varieties tested performed well,which could be planted in Hanting District.The comprehensive characters of‘Mezao’‘Red Light’and‘Samit’showed better performance than other varieties,which could be mainly promoted.‘Pioneer’overall performance was slightly poor,‘Brooks’crack was more obvious,not recommended to expand the promotion.
Keywords:Hanting District  Cherry  Plant Performance
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号