Einfluss der Zwischenlagerung auf die anfängliche Entwicklung rekultivierter Oberböden |
| |
Authors: | Beat Schäffer Lisa Eggenschwiler Brigitte Suter Lea Vogt Bernhard Buchter Hans Pfister Rainer Schulin |
| |
Institution: | 1. Institut für Terrestrische ?kosysteme, ETH Zürich, Universit?tstra?e 16, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz;2. Basler & Hofmann Ingenieure und Planer AG, Bachweg 1, 8133 Esslingen, Schweiz;3. Aktuelle Adresse: Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Reckenholz‐T?nikon ART, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zürich, Schweiz |
| |
Abstract: | Influence of temporary stockpiling on the initial development of restored topsoils Due to increasing construction and open‐cast mining activities on fertile agricultural land, excavation, stockpiling, and restoration of soils have become important issues in soil protection. In this study, we performed a restoration experiment to investigate how the conditions during stockpiling may influence initial soil development and plant growth on a restored site. Four topsoils, which originated from two depths (with uninhibited and inhibited aeration) of a nontrafficked and a trafficked topsoil deposit, were repacked in strips and sown with three meadow‐seed mixtures in strips perpendicular to the soil strips. During stockpiling as well as during the first 2 years after restoration, we assessed the physical and mechanical properties of the topsoils and (after restoration) also plant growth. None of the investigated properties of the topsoils was influenced by the depth in the deposit. In contrast, the coarse porosity and compression index were lower, whereas the bulk density and precompression stress were higher in the trafficked than in the nontrafficked topsoil deposit. However, these differences largely disappeared already in the course of soil restoration. Contrary to our expectations, the plants grew better on the soil of the trafficked topsoil deposit than on the soil of the nontrafficked topsoil deposit in the year of restoration. This might be attributed to the extremely dry and hot summer of that year. In the course of the 2 years following restoration, also the differences in plant growth tended to disappear. The remaining differences in bulk density and plant growth could not be attributed to differences in stockpiling conditions. The results suggest a re‐examination of current soil restoration guidelines. The maximum permitted stockpiling heights for topsoils might be increased in order to reduce the areas required for temporary stockpiling. |
| |
Keywords: | Bodenrekultivierung Bodenverdichtung Zwischenlagerung Oberbodenlager Qualitä t geschü tteter Bö den Pflanzenwachstum |
|
|