首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

三种CRISPR/Cas9基因敲除变异检测方法的比较分析
引用本文:唐国盘,黄安群,孙志鹏,匡友谊,王胜杰,王大伟.三种CRISPR/Cas9基因敲除变异检测方法的比较分析[J].淡水渔业,2019,49(2):20-26.
作者姓名:唐国盘  黄安群  孙志鹏  匡友谊  王胜杰  王大伟
作者单位:中国水产科学研究院黑龙江水产研究所,哈尔滨 150070;河南牧业经济学院动物科技学院,郑州 450046;华中农业大学水产学院,武汉 430070;河南牧业经济学院动物科技学院,郑州,450046;中国水产科学研究院黑龙江水产研究所,哈尔滨,150070
基金项目:中国水产科学研究院基本科研业务费专项;淡水鱼类育种国家地方联合工程实验室开放课题;河南牧业经济学院学术带头人;河南省科技攻关计划
摘    要:比较三种常用的CRISPR/Cas9基因敲除检测变异方法,从准确性、耗时、成本和应用限制等方面进行评估。采用T7核酸内切酶I、限制性内切酶和非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳法分别对利用CRISPR/Cas9方法敲除的fibinb和ngs基因的50尾斑马鱼(Danio rerio)突变纯合个体和突变杂合个体进行检测,用野生型个体作对照;同时用非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳对CRISPR/Cas9方法敲除的ogn和ddb1基因的突变杂合个体进行了检测。结果表明:三种方法均能够区分突变杂合个体,其中T7核酸内切酶I检测法耗时最短,但该方法不能用于鉴定突变纯合个体;限制性内切酶检测法能够用于鉴定纯合个体,但需要有特异性的识别位点;非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳法能够区分纯合和杂合个体,对序列无依赖性,能够检测出序列中存在的所有变异。成本上,非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳法最经济;限制性内切酶的价格存在较大的差异,因此检测成本依赖于酶的价格。三种检测方法各有优缺点,在应用实践中可根据试验需要选择合适的方法。

关 键 词:CRISPR/Cas9  T7核酸内切酶Ⅰ  限制性内切酶  非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳  检测

Comparative analysis of three methods for detecting gene mutation using CRISPR/Cas9 knockdown system
TANG Guo-pan,HUANG An-qun,SUN Zhi-peng,KUANG You-yi,WANG Sheng-jie,WANG Da-wei.Comparative analysis of three methods for detecting gene mutation using CRISPR/Cas9 knockdown system[J].Freshwater Fisheries,2019,49(2):20-26.
Authors:TANG Guo-pan  HUANG An-qun  SUN Zhi-peng  KUANG You-yi  WANG Sheng-jie  WANG Da-wei
Institution:(Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute ,Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences,Harbin 150070,China;College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou 450046,China;College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan 430070, China)
Abstract:The accuracy, time consuming and limitations on use of 3 methods were evaluated in this study. to compare three different detecting methods for gene mutation using the conventional CRISPR/Cas9 system. CRISPR/Cas9 method was used to knockdown the fibinb and ngs gene in Danio rerio and the gene mutation of 50 homozygous and 50 heterozygous individuals was detected using T7 endonuclease I method, restriction enzyme method and non-denaturing PAGE method, respectively. The wild type individuals were used as the control. The results indicated that all of the three methods could distinguish the heterozygous from homozygous individuals. T7 endonuclease I method had the shortest time-consuming but could not be applied into the identification of mutant homozygous individuals. Restriction enzyme method could be used to identify the homozygous individuals depending on the specific recognition sites. However, parts of sites could not be detected using the restriction enzymes. Non-denaturing PAGE could distinguish the homozygous from heterozygous individuals, and this method was sequence-independent and could detect all mutations in the sequences. Non-denaturing PAGE was the most economical in three methods based on the cost standpoint. There were great differences on the costs of restriction enzyme method depending on the price of enzymes. The three detection methods all have their own advantages and disadvantages so that the appropriate method should be chosen according to the experimental requirements in practical application.
Keywords:CRISPR/Cas9  T7E1  restriction enzyme  non-denaturing PAGE  detection
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号