首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

浙南海涂围垦区土壤品质综合评价
引用本文:杨升,陈秋夏,王金旺,李效文,夏海涛,包考松,郑托. 浙南海涂围垦区土壤品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(6): 961-968. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.06.006
作者姓名:杨升  陈秋夏  王金旺  李效文  夏海涛  包考松  郑托
作者单位:1.浙江省亚热带作物研究所, 浙江 温州 3250052.温州市瓯江口开发建设投资集团有限公司, 浙江 温州 325026
基金项目:浙江省农业科学院青年人才培养项目2015R26R08E03温州市公益性农业科技项目N20150022温州市森林生态科技创新团队项目C20150002
摘    要:系统掌握浙南海涂围垦区土壤品质现状和空间分布特征,为绿地系统规划、土壤改良措施和绿化工程实施提供参考依据。通过取样调查,获得土壤基本性状,再采用模糊数学综合评价土壤品质与分级,并运用全球定位系统(GPS),ARCGIS分析软件和Surfer软件获得土壤品质等值线分布图。结果表明:①研究区域土壤容重偏大,为1.32 g·cm-3,且含盐量高,为7.7 g·kg-1,碱性强,pH 8.25,有机质质量分数偏少,为17.94 g·kg-1,全氮和有效磷质量分数严重偏低,分别为0.69 g·kg-1和4.82 mg·kg-1,而速效钾质量分数丰富,为0.62 g·kg-1。②土壤含盐量是浙南滨海围垦区土壤品质的主要限制因子,容重和pH值也是重要评价指标。③研究区域土壤品质总体较差,并且表层土壤品质(综合评价值为0.482)略好于下层土壤(综合评价值为0.435)。土壤品质分级与等值线分布图可以更好地指导土壤改良和植被构建,需要降低土壤含盐量、pH值和容重,选取优良耐盐碱植物进行绿化种植。图1表5参33

关 键 词:土壤学   浙南   围垦区   综合评价值   土壤品质分级
收稿时间:2015-11-05

Soil quality evaluation in a coastal reclamation region of southern Zhejiang Province
YANG Sheng,CHEN Qiuxia,WANG Jinwang,LI Xiaowen,XIA Haitao,BAO Kaosong,ZHENG Tuo. Soil quality evaluation in a coastal reclamation region of southern Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2016, 33(6): 961-968. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.06.006
Authors:YANG Sheng  CHEN Qiuxia  WANG Jinwang  LI Xiaowen  XIA Haitao  BAO Kaosong  ZHENG Tuo
Affiliation:1.Zhejiang Institute of Subtropical Crops, Wenzhou 325005, Zhejiang, China2.Wenzhou Oujiangkou Development and Construction Investment Group Co., Ltd., Wenzhou 325026, Zhejiang, China
Abstract:To systematically comprehend soil quality status and its spatial pattern in a coastal saline reclamation region of southern Zhejiang Province, to provide a reference for green space system planning, and for soil improvement and implementation of the green project, basic soil properties were obtained through survey sampling. A total of 61 soil samples which was composed of 8 to 12 profiles mixed in 0-20 cm and 40-60 cm were collected. A comprehensive soil quality evaluation and classification was conducted using fuzzy mathematics. Then, a soil quality contour map was obtained using GPS, ARCGIS analysis software, and Surfer software. Results showed that (1) soil bulk density (1.32 g·cm-3), salt content (7.7 g·kg-1), and pH (8.25) were all extremely high; soil organic matter (17.94 g·kg-1), total nitrogen (0.69 g·kg-1), and available phosphorus content (4.82 mg·kg-1) were severely deficient; and available potassium (0.62 g·kg-1) was abundant. (2) Soil salinity was the main limiting soil quality factor with soil bulk density and pH being important evaluation indexes. (3) Soil quality status across the study region was generally low with soil quality for the topsoil (IFI:0.482) better than the subsoil (IFI:0.435). Therefore, soil quality classification and contour mapping could provide guidance for soil improvement and vegetation planning, but for landscaping, soils would require lower soil salt content, pH, and soil bulk density, along with a selection of highly salt-tolerant plants.[Ch, 1 fig. 5 tab. 33 ref.]
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《浙江农林大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江农林大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号