In vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of three Porphyromonas spp and in vivo responses in the oral cavity of cats to selected antimicrobial agents

OBJECTIVES: To determine in vitro susceptibility of Porphyromonas gingivalis, P salivosa and P circumdentaria to seven antimicrobial agents by agar dilution and Epsilometer test methods and to assess the effectiveness of these antimicrobial agents in reducing the numbers of each Porphyromonas spp in the oral cavity of 16 domestic cats. DESIGN: A two-part prospective study involving in vitro antimicro-bial studies using Porphyromonas spp obtained from naturally occurring feline infections and in vivo antimicrobial response studies using client-owned cats with naturally occurring periodontal disease. PROCEDURE: Isolates (n = 25) of three feline Porphyromonas spp from the oral cavity and oral-associated disease were tested for their in vitro susceptibility to amoxycillin, amoxycillin-clavulanate, benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, doxycycline, erythromycin and metronidazole, using agar dilution and Epsilometer test methods. Digoxigenin-labelled whole chromosomal DNA probes directed against P gingivalis VPB 3492, P circumdentaria NCTC 12469T and P salivosa VPB 3313 were used to quantify organisms taken from two sample sites at the gingival margins of these cats prior to, and 5 days after, treatment with one of four commonly used antimicrobial products (amoxycillin-clavulanate, clindamycin, doxycycline or spiramycin-metronidazole). The response to treatment was assessed clinically for each cat. RESULTS: All isolates were susceptible in vitro to all seven antimicrobial agents using both methods. The numbers of P gingivalis were not reduced at the gingival sample sites by administration of amoxycillin-clavulanate for 5 days, although this treatment reduced the numbers of P salivosa and P circumdentaria to below detection levels in six of eight and two of three of sample sites, respectively; clinical improvement was not observed in cats treated with amoxycillin-clavulanate. Treatment with clindamycin, doxycycline or spiramycin-metronidazole resulted in clinical improvement and a marked reduction of all Porphyromonas isolates at the sample sites. CONCLUSION: The Epsilometer test is a simple and accurate method for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration for P gingivalis, P salivosa and P circumdentaria. All strains were susceptible in vitro to all the antimicrobial agents tested although clinical improvement of gingival disease was not noted with amoxycillin-clavulanate when given for 5 days at usual doses. This appears to be the first report of the disparity between the in vivo and in vitro susceptibility of oral bacterial strains to amoxycillin-clavulanate in the veterinary dental literature. This also appears to be the first report in which clinical and microbiological responses to commonly used antimicrobial agents for periodontal disease in cats has been documented and quantified. It was shown that treatment with clindamycin, spiramycin-metronidazole or doxycycline not only produced a substantial reduction in the number of Porphyromonas spp (in the majority of cases to below detection levels), but also resulted in substantial clinical improvement. This would indicate that these antimicrobial agents are useful adjunctive therapy to mechanical debridement in domestic cats.