首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

野生和野生亲本子一代大眼幼体在扣蟹阶段养殖性能的比较
引用本文:王海宁,姜晓东,邓登,吴旭干,王少兵,成永旭. 野生和野生亲本子一代大眼幼体在扣蟹阶段养殖性能的比较[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2019, 28(1): 67-74
作者姓名:王海宁  姜晓东  邓登  吴旭干  王少兵  成永旭
作者单位:上海海洋大学农业部淡水种质资源重点实验室;上海海洋大学水产动物遗传育种上海市协同创新中心;上海海洋大学水产科学国家级实验教学示范中心;浙江澳凌水产种业科技有限公司
基金项目:农业部现代农业产业技术体系专项(CARS-48);上海市高水平地方高校建设科研项目(A1-2801-18-1003);上海市科委工程技术中心能力提升项目(16DZ2281200);浙江省湖州市人社局"湖州市南太湖精英计划"(湖精英领2017-1C);深圳市澳华农牧有限公司横向项目(D-8006-16-0088)
摘    要:通过养殖实验,比较野生捕捞大眼幼体(G0)和野生亲本人工繁育大眼幼体(G1)在扣蟹养殖阶段的生长、成活率、早熟率和最终产量等指标,结果显示:(1)无论雌体还是雄体,野生群体在扣蟹阶段的平均体质量一直低于野生子一代群体,其中雌体120和150日龄时规格差异显著(P 0. 05);(2)两群体的增重率(weight growth rate,WGR)均呈下降趋势,且野生群体在扣蟹阶段的WGR总体低于人工繁育群体,仅雌体150~180日龄及180~210日龄这两个时间段内高于人工繁育群体;特定增长率(specific growth rate,SGR)变化趋势及差异性与WGR类似;(3)野生群体养成扣蟹的最终平均规格和一龄早熟率均低于人工繁育群体,但平均成活率和最终产量却高于人工繁育群体;(4)野生群体养成的最终扣蟹体质量主要集中于0~4. 00 g(36. 76%),并且显著高于野生G1人工繁育群体(P 0. 05),人工繁育群体体质量主要集中于4. 00~5. 99 g(26. 93%)和6. 00~7. 99 g (25. 43%)这两个范围内,两群体扣蟹在≥12 g体质量范围内的占比均较低,分别为8. 46%和7. 60%。野生亲本繁育子一代的大眼幼体在扣蟹阶段的平均体质量较大,但成活率和平均产量相对较低。通过养殖实验初步比较了两种不同来源的野生大眼幼体在扣蟹阶段的养殖效果,为合理选育和利用野生大眼幼体提供实践依据。

关 键 词:中华绒螯蟹  大眼幼体  亲本  扣蟹阶段  养殖性能  野生
收稿时间:2018-08-09
修稿时间:2018-10-24

Evaluation of culture performance of wild megalopae and offspring of wild broodstock of Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis during juvenile culture stage
WANG Haining,JIANG Xiaodong,DENG Deng,WU Xugan,WANG Shaobing and CHENG Yongxu. Evaluation of culture performance of wild megalopae and offspring of wild broodstock of Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis during juvenile culture stage[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2019, 28(1): 67-74
Authors:WANG Haining  JIANG Xiaodong  DENG Deng  WU Xugan  WANG Shaobing  CHENG Yongxu
Affiliation:Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;National Demonstration Centre for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China,Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;National Demonstration Centre for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China,Zhejiang Aoling Aquacultrue Seed Industry Co., Ltd, Changxing 313106, Zhejiang, China,Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;National Demonstration Centre for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China,Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;National Demonstration Centre for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China and Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;National Demonstration Centre for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
Abstract:
Keywords:Chinese mitten crab  megalopa  broodstock  juvenile stage  culture performance  wild
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《上海海洋大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《上海海洋大学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号