Biomass production and nutrient removal by tropical grasses subsurface drip‐irrigated with dairy effluent

Effluent lagoons on dairy farms can overflow and potentially pollute adjacent land and associated water bodies. An alternative solution to effluent disposal is needed by dairy operators in island environments. An attractive win‐win alternative is to recycle nutrients from this resource through effluent irrigation for forage grass production that minimizes environmental pollution. This study assessed biomass production and nutrient removal by, and high application rates to, tropical grasses that were subsurface drip‐irrigated with dairy effluent. Four grass species – Banagrass (Pennisetum purpureum K. Schumach.), California grass (Brachiaria mutica (Forssk.) Stapf.), Stargrass (Cynodon nlemfuensis Vanderyst) and Suerte grass (Paspalum atratum Swallen) – were subsurface (20–25 cm) drip‐irrigated with effluent at two rates based on potential evapotranspiration (ET_p) at the site (Waianae, Hawaii) ?2·0 ET_p (16 mm d^?1 in winter; 23 mm d^?1 in summer) and 0·5 ET_p (5 mm d^?1 in winter; 6 mm d^?1 in summer). Treatments were arranged in an augmented completely randomized design. Brachiaria mutica and P. purpureum had the highest dry‐matter yield (43–57 t ha^?1 year^?1) and nutrient uptake especially with the 2·0 ET_p irrigation rate (1083–1405 kg ha^?1 year^?1 N, 154–164 kg ha^?1 year^?1 P, 1992–2141 kg ha^?1 year^?1 K). Average removal of nutrients by the grasses was 25–94% of the applied nitrogen, 11–82% of phosphorus and 2–13% of the potassium. Average values of crude protein (90–160 g kg^?1), neutral detergent fibre (570–620 g kg^?1) and acid detergent fibre (320–360 g kg^?1) were at levels acceptable for feeding to lactating cattle. Results suggest that P. purpureum and B. mutica irrigated with effluent effectively recycled nutrients in the milk production system.