首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A systematic review and meta-analysis of Hymenolepis nana in human and rodent hosts in Iran: A remaining public health concern
Affiliation:1. Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 04001 Košice, Slovakia;2. Horni Lipská 157, 257 24 Chocerady, Czech Republic;3. Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany;4. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland;5. University of Basel, P.O. Box, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland;1. Department of Parasitology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan;2. Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;3. Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Sichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, China;4. Department of Bacteriology and Immunology/Immunobiology Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;5. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Vantaa, Finland
Abstract:Hymenolepis nana, as a neglected zoonotic helminth, naturally occurs in both humans and rodents. Herein, a systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to estimate pooled prevalence of H. nana infection among human and rodent hosts for the first time in Iran. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases (English articles) and SID and Magiran databases (Persian articles) were systematically searched for relevant studies published from inception till May 24, 2020. Chi2 and I2 index were used to assess the heterogeneity of the included studies. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's intercept and visual inspection of the funnel plot. Pooled prevalence was estimated using random-effects model with 95 % confidence interval (CI) and depicted as a forest plot. STATA software was used for analysis. The overall pooled prevalence estimate of H. nana in humans included 1.2 % (95 % CI = 1.0–1.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed 2.2 % (95 % CI = 1.8–2.6%) and 0.5 % (95 % CI = 0.3 to 0.8 %) of H. nana infection among school children and food handlers, respectively. In terms of rodent hosts, the overall pooled prevalence of H. nana infection included 13 % (95 % CI = 9.3–16.6%). Subgroup analysis revealed the highest rate of the infection was in Rattus spp. (19.6 %; 95 % CI = 10.6–28.6%), a genus with synanthropic behavior. It seems, despite the advancement in sanitation infrastructure and hygiene status, the H. nana infection compares to other helminthic diseases remains a challenging public health problem in Iran.
Keywords:Human  Rodents  Systematic review  Meta-analysis  Iran
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号