Intake, performance and carcass characteristics of beef cattle offered diets based on whole-crop wheat or forage maize relative to grass silage or ad libitum concentrates

Seventy beef steers, mean initial live-weight 424 (S.D. 33.0) kg, were blocked by live-weight and breed and allocated to one of 5 dietary treatments in a randomised complete block design. Treatments, including supplementation with 3 kg concentrates/head/day, were grass silage (GS), maize silage (MS), fermented whole-crop wheat (FWCW), urea-treated, processed whole-crop wheat (UPWCW), and ad libitum concentrates supplemented with 5 kg grass silage/head/day (ALC). The grain in urea-treated, processed whole-crop wheat (WCW) was cracked and the crop ensiled with a urea plus urease-based additive. The mean dry matter (DM) of the grass silage, maize silage, fermented WCW and urea-treated, processed WCW was 174, 315, 404 and 716 g/kg, respectively. Total DM intake and carcass growth were lowest for GS (P < 0.001). Relative to ALC, feed conversion efficiency (FCE) (P < 0.05), live-weight gain (P < 0.05), carcass-weight gain (P < 0.01) and kill-out rate (P < 0.05) were lower for GS, FWCW and UPWCW. The MS had a better FCE than the UPWCW (P < 0.001) or the FWCW (P < 0.05). Plasma urea concentration was lowest for MS and highest for UPWCW (P < 0.001). Animals offered the GS treatment had the most yellow fat (higher (P < 0.05) ‘b’ value) and those offered UPWCW had the whitest fat (lower (P < 0.01) ‘b’ value). It is concluded that MS, FWCW and UPWCW supported superior levels of growth by cattle compared to GS (in vitro DM digestibility 674 g/kg). There was no animal productivity advantage with UPWCW compared to FWCW.