Rose flower production as related to plant architecture and carbohydrate content: Effect of harvesting method and plant type

Summary

The dependence between flowering cycles and woody stem parts of a rose crop was studied, with respect to plant architecture and carbohydrate content. Two harvesting methods (“control” versus “flush”) and two plant types (“control” versus “one stemmed”) were compared. Crop growth and partitioning of dry matter were studied as influenced by crop management during 18 months of culture. For a full-productive year, flush harvesting generally promoted bud break as compared with continuous harvesting but at the same time, also due to lower light interception, blind-shoot formation was enhanced and the individual flower weight reduced. Numbers of basal shoots were hardly related to flower production over a full cropping year. Flower production was much more sensitive to the number and diameter of branches at the height of cutting the flowers. The treatments did not affect carbohydrate allocation in the plant. Total carbohydrate storage was much too low to argue a clear role for the possible use of movement of carbohydrate reserves towards new growth. Maximum starch concentration was found at the beginning of summer and gradually dropped to a minimum in December and then increased again to a spring maximum. A cold treatment did increase the total non-structural carbohydrate (TNC) concentration but no positive influence on new basal-shoot formation was observed. No starch gradient was found in basal stem parts.