首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同耕作措施下春小麦产量对温度变化的敏感性分析
引用本文:董莉霞,李广,闫丽娟,刘强,燕振刚. 不同耕作措施下春小麦产量对温度变化的敏感性分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(4): 36-40
作者姓名:董莉霞  李广  闫丽娟  刘强  燕振刚
作者单位:1. 甘肃农业大学信息科学技术学院,甘肃 兰州,730070
2. 甘肃农业大学信息科学技术学院,甘肃 兰州 730070; 甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730070
3. 甘肃农业大学农学院,甘肃 兰州,730070
基金项目:甘肃省自然科学基金(1308RJZ272);甘肃省科技支撑计划(144NKC038);甘肃省高等学校基本科研业务费项目;国家自然科学基金项目(31060178);干旱生境作物学重点实验室开放基金
摘    要:为了研究温度变化对不同耕作条件下春小麦产量的影响,利用修正参数后的APSIM模型,自变量因子分别为最低温度、最高温度,在9种变化条件下对传统耕作+秸秆还田(TS)、免耕(NT)、免耕覆盖(NTS)3种耕作措施下的春小麦产量进行了模拟,并利用Surfer软件对产量变化率进行了敏感性分析。结果表明:在三种不同耕作措施下,春小麦产量变化率对最高温度的变化更为敏感,最高温度升高,产量变化率呈负敏感;在传统耕作+秸秆还田和免耕覆盖耕作措施下,春小麦平均产量分别是2 268.8 kg·hm-2和2 274.0 kg·hm-2,明显高于免耕耕作措施下的春小麦平均产量1 815.4 kg·hm-2;传统耕作+秸秆还田和免耕覆盖耕作措施下,小麦产量随温度变化相对稳定;当最低温度和最高温度在一定区域范围内变化时,传统耕作+秸秆还田和免耕覆盖产量表现更稳定。

关 键 词:APSIM模型  春小麦  耕作措施  敏感性

Sensitivity analysis of spring wheat to variations in temperatures under different tillage measures
DONG Li-xi,LI Guang,YAN Li-juan,LIU Qiang,YAN Zhen-gang. Sensitivity analysis of spring wheat to variations in temperatures under different tillage measures[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015, 33(4): 36-40
Authors:DONG Li-xi  LI Guang  YAN Li-juan  LIU Qiang  YAN Zhen-gang
Abstract:In order to study the influences of temperature variations under different tillage conditions on yield of spring wheat, a revised APSIM model was used. A simulation was implemented to analyze the yield of spring wheat by cultivation measures including conventional tillage & straw turnover (TS), no-till (NT), and no-tillage with mulch (NTS) under nine variable conditions using lowest and highest temperatures as the independent variable factors. Then the surfer software was used to complete the sensitivity analysis. The result shows that under three different cultivation measures, yield rate of the spring wheat was more sensitive to the variations of the highest temperature. When the highest temperature rose, yield rate showed a negative sensitivity. Under conventional tillage + straw returned and no-till cover tillage measures, the average yield of spring wheat are respectively 2 268.8 kg·hm-2 and 2 274.0 kg·hm-2, significantly higher than the average yield of spring wheat 1 815.4 kg·hm-2 of no-till tillage measures. Under traditional farming + straw returned and no-till cover tillage measures, wheat production seemed stable with the changes of temperatures. When the lowest and highest temperatures varied within a certain range, wheat production under traditional farming + straw returned and no-till cover condition was stable.
Keywords:APSIM model  spring wheat  tillage measures  sensitivity
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《干旱地区农业研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《干旱地区农业研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号