首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

口蹄疫疫苗非抗原蛋白对146S抗原免疫效果的影响
引用本文:李明,张雅娜,郭晓宇,高新桃,李金祥,朱鸿飞. 口蹄疫疫苗非抗原蛋白对146S抗原免疫效果的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2019, 46(3): 905-912. DOI: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2019.03.032
作者姓名:李明  张雅娜  郭晓宇  高新桃  李金祥  朱鸿飞
作者单位:1. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 北京 100193;
2. 北京信和翔科技有限责任公司, 北京 100085;
3. 中国农业科学院生物技术研究所, 北京 100081
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0502306、2017YFD0502302)
摘    要:为探究非抗原蛋白对口蹄疫病毒A型(FMDV-A) 146S抗原免疫效果的影响,本研究以小鼠和猪为试验动物,分别制备5组小鼠注射用样品:A组(3μg 146S抗原)、B组(3μg 146S抗原+25μg非抗原蛋白)、C组(3μg 146S抗原+50μg非抗原蛋白)、D组(3μg 146S抗原+100μg非抗原蛋白)及E组(空白对照,PBS);同时制备4组猪注射用样品:A组(18μg 146S抗原)、B组(18μg 146S抗原+400μg非抗原蛋白)、C(18μg 146S抗原+4 000μg非抗原蛋白)及D组(空白对照,PBS)。免疫接种试验动物后,通过淋巴细胞增殖试验及实时荧光定量PCR评价比较不同疫苗样品组小鼠产生的细胞免疫应答水平,同时通过液相阻断ELISA方法检测、评价各试验组动物(小鼠和猪)产生的体液免疫应答水平。小鼠试验结果显示,在免疫后3个检测时间点内,4个试验组中C组的平均抗体水平最高,平均抗体效价分别为4.13、5.83和5.50,而D组的抗体水平最低,平均抗体效价分别为3.46、5.16和4.46;C组细胞增殖能力及Th-1型细胞因子IL-6、IFN-β和TNF-αmRNA表达量均高于其他组。猪试验结果显示,A组和B组间平均抗体水平差异不显著(P>0.05),但A组和B组的平均抗体效价均极显著高于C组(P<0.01)。综合上述结果表明,一定范围内少量非抗原蛋白对FMDV-A 146S抗原的免疫效果没有影响,而高浓度的非抗原蛋白则抑制FMDV-A 146S抗原的免疫效果。

关 键 词:非抗原蛋白  口蹄疫  146S抗原  免疫效果
收稿时间:2018-07-30

Effect of Non-antigen Protein of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine on Immune Effect of 146S Antigen
LI Ming,ZHANG Yana,GUO Xiaoyu,GAO Xintao,LI Jinxiang,ZHU Hongfei. Effect of Non-antigen Protein of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine on Immune Effect of 146S Antigen[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2019, 46(3): 905-912. DOI: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2019.03.032
Authors:LI Ming  ZHANG Yana  GUO Xiaoyu  GAO Xintao  LI Jinxiang  ZHU Hongfei
Affiliation:1. Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Beijing Xinhexiang Technology Co., LLC, Beijing 100085, China;
3. Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract:In order to explore the effect of non-antigen protein on the immune effect of foot-and-mouth disease virus type A (FMDV-A) 146S antigen,mice and pigs were used as experimental animals.5 groups of mice for injection were prepared:Group A (3 μg 146S antigen),group B (3 μg 146S antigen+25 μg non-antigenic protein),group C (3 μg 146S antigen+50 μg non-antigenic protein),group D (3 μg 146S antigen+100 μg non-antigenic protein) and group E (blank control,PBS).At the same time,four groups of pig injection samples were prepared:Group A (18 μg 146S antigen),group B (18 μg 146S antigen+400 μg non-antigenic protein),group C (18 μg 146S antigen+4 000 μg non-antigenic protein) and group D (blank control,PBS).The cell immune response levels of mice in different vaccine sample groups were compared by lymphocyte proliferation assay and Real-time PCR.The level of humoral immune response produced by the animals (mice and pigs) of each test group was detected and evaluated by a liquid phase blocking ELISA method.The results of mice test showed that the average antibody level of group C was the highest in four test groups at the three test time points after immunization,and the average antibody titers were 4.13,5.83 and 5.50,respectively,while the antibody of group D was the lowest,the average antibody titer average antibody titers were 3.46,5.16 and 4.46 in the antibody detection,respectively;The cell proliferation ability and Th-1 type cytokine IL-6,IFN-β and TNF-α mRNA expression in group C were higher than other groups.The results of pigs test showed that the average antibody level between groups A and B was not significantly different (P>0.05),but the average antibody titers of groups A and B were extremely significantly higher than that of group C (P<0.01).The above results indicated that a small amount of non-antigenic protein had no effect on the immune effect of FMDV-A 146S antigen within a certain range,while a high concentration of non-antigenic protein inhibited the immune effect of FMDV-A 146S antigen.
Keywords:non-antigenic proteins  foot-and-mouth disease  146S antigen  immune effect  
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国畜牧兽医》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国畜牧兽医》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号