首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

陕北不同地貌部位土壤抗冲性特征研究
引用本文:郑江坤,吴黎军,魏天兴,赵健,陈致富,夏菁. 陕北不同地貌部位土壤抗冲性特征研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(6)
作者姓名:郑江坤  吴黎军  魏天兴  赵健  陈致富  夏菁
作者单位:1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 邯郸学院地理与旅游系,河北,邯郸,056005
摘    要:以陕北吴起县为例,采用原状土冲刷法,对各地貌部位不同植被类型问的土壤抗冲过程进行测试研究,结果表明:(1)在抗冲过程初期土壤抗冲值均较小,且随时间逐渐增大,随后抗冲值随时间呈波浪式变化,呈现单峰、双峰和多峰变化,除农地外所有土样在整个抗冲过程均有突变值的存在;(2)在梁(峁)顶、梁(峁)坡、沟坡和沟底,抗冲性最强的植被类型分别为沙棘林(草地)、油松小叶杨山杏混交林、柠条林和旱柳小叶杨混交林,农地的抗冲性能最差;(3)草地和灌木林在各地貌部位问的抗冲刷系数都表现为:梁峁顶>梁峁坡>沟坡>沟底,乔木林总体上表现为:梁峁坡>梁峁顶>沟坡>沟底,林分类型间的抗冲性表现为:针阔混交林>阔叶混交林>针叶纯林>阔叶纯林;(4)不同整地方法下的土壤抗冲性也表现出很大的差异,以油松林为例,表现出水平阶整地的抗冲性能优于鱼鳞坑,另外水平阶阶坎上的土壤抗冲刷系数要高于水平阶阶面,其他整地方法的抗冲性能有待进一步研究.

关 键 词:植被类型  地貌  抗冲性  黄土丘陵沟壑区

Study on Soil Anti-scourability of Different Topography Positions in Northern Shaanxi
ZHENG Jiang-kun,WU Li-jun,WEI Tian-xing,ZHAO Jian,CHEN Zhi-fu,XIA Jing. Study on Soil Anti-scourability of Different Topography Positions in Northern Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(6)
Authors:ZHENG Jiang-kun  WU Li-jun  WEI Tian-xing  ZHAO Jian  CHEN Zhi-fu  XIA Jing
Abstract:Take Wuqi county in northern Shaanxi as example,by Scour method of undisturbed soil,soil antiscour process of the different vegetation types in each topography position were tested and studied.Results showed that:(1)Soil anti-scour values were all small and increased gradually in the initial stage of anti-scour process,subsequently,followed by change of wave form with unimodal,bimodal and multi-peak.With the exception of farmland,there were break points in all soil samples in the process of soil anti-scour.(2)Buckthorn shrub(grassland),mixed forest of Chinese Pine-Simon Poplar-Prunus Armeniaca,Caragana shrub and mixed forest of Willow-Simon Poplar were strongest in ability of anti-scour respectively in top vally,vally slope,gully slope,gully bottom,Farmland were worst in ability of anti-scour.(3)Soil anti-scour coefficdent of grassland and shrab in each topography position were as follows:top vally>ally slope>gully slope>gully bottom.The arbor forest were as follows:ally slope>top vally>gully slope>gully bottom.Soil anti-scour ability among stand types presented as:mixed wood>broadleaved mixed forest>pure broadleaved forest>pure needles forest.(4)Soil anti-scourability trader different methods of land preparation appeared different.Take Chinese Pine forest as an example.anti-scourability in level-terrace site preparation were better than in scale ripple site preparation,while soil anti-erosion coefficient on level-terrace platform is higher than on level-terrace step.Soil anti-scourability shoud be studied further in other methods of land preparation.
Keywords:vegetation types  topography  soil anti-scourability  loess plateau hilly and gully region
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号