Fuel mass and stand structure after post-fire logging of a severely burned ponderosa pine forest in northeastern Oregon |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Forestry and Range Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Research Station, La Grande, OR, USA;2. Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Seattle, WA, USA;1. School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100, United States;2. Sciences and Mathematics Division, School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA, United States;3. US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, Seattle, WA, United States;1. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 15018, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA;2. Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2500 S. Pine Knoll Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA;1. Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Av. Fuentenueva s/n, E-18071 Granada, Spain;2. Department Hydrosystemmodellierung, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH – UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany;3. Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS), CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, E-30100 Espinardo, Murcia, Spain;4. Departamento de Edafología y Química Agrícola, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Av. Fuentenueva s/n, E-18071 Granada, Spain;5. US Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Jemez Mountains Field Station, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Stand structure and fuel mass were measured before and after a post-fire logging operation conducted 2 years after the 1996 Summit Wildfire (Malheur National Forest), in a ponderosa pine-dominated forest in northeastern Oregon. Variables were measured both pre- and post-logging in four replicate units for each of three treatments [un-logged control, commercial harvest (most dead merchantable trees removed), fuel reduction harvest (most dead merchantable trees removed plus most dead trees >10 cm diameter)]. Post-fire logging resulted in a significant decrease in mean basal area, down to 46% pre-treatment level in commercial units, and down to 25% in fuel reduction units. Logging significantly reduced tree density, especially for the smallest (<22 cm diameter) and intermediate (23–41 cm) diameter classes. Fuel reduction units also had significantly fewer snags (dead trees >30 cm diameter—4 ha−1), compared to both commercial (23 ha−1) units and to un-logged controls (64 ha−1) in the year following timber harvest. Logging did not change ladder height or tree species composition (% ponderosa pine, Douglas-fir and grand fir). Total woody fuel mass increased significantly in fuel reduction units when compared to controls, with the greatest difference among treatments occurring in the slash fuel (<7.6 cm diameter) component (mean of 6.2 Mg/ha for fuel reduction stands versus 1.3 Mg/ha for un-logged stands). Logging activity caused no change in the mass of the forest floor (litter or duff). Model projections of the fuel bed using the fire and fuels extension of the forest vegetation simulator (FVS–FFE) indicate that the disparity in slash fuel mass between fuel reduction and un-logged units would be sustained until about 15 years post-logging, but a re-burn of moderate intensity occurring during this time would likely kill all young trees, even in un-logged units, because of the influence of other components of the fuel bed, such as grasses and shrubs. Model projections of 1000-h fuels (woody fuels >7.6 cm diameter) indicate that standing structure in all stands would collapse quickly, with the result that un-logged stands would contain two- or three-fold greater masses at 25 and 50 years post-logging, leading to much higher consumption rates of fuel in the event of a re-burn in the same place. Variation in dead tree fall and decay rates did not change the relationship among treatments in 1000-h fuel loads, but changed the time at which treatment differences were projected to disappear. Despite treatment differences in heavy fuel accumulations over time however, FVS–FFE predicts no differences among treatments in mortality of young trees due to either moderate or high intensity fire occurring in the same place at 25, 50, or 100 years post-fire logging. The lack of a re-burn effect is in part due to the reliance on flame length as the primary mechanism leading to tree death in the fire effect models used by FVS–FFE. If tree death turns out to be caused more by root burning or cambial heating, the observed variations in 1000-h fuel loadings among treatments could be significant in the event of a future re-burn. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|