Pressure,droplet size classification,and nozzle arrangement effects on coverage and droplet number density using air-inclusion dual fan nozzles for pesticide applications |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Agricultural Sciences, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, MO, USA;2. Centre for Pesticide Application and Safety, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia;1. Universitat de Lleida–Agrotecnio Center, RG in AgroICT & Precision Agriculture, Avenida Rovira Roure, 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain;2. Dow AgroSciences Ibérica S.A., C/ Ribera de Loira 4-6, 28042 Madrid, Spain;3. Centro de Agroingeniería, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Ctra. CV-315, Km 10.7, 46113 Moncada, Valencia, Spain;1. Biosystems Engineering Department, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran;2. Lincoln Agritech Ltd., Lincoln University, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand;1. Unité Mixte de Recherche Information & Technologies for AgroProcess, IRSTEA, 361 rue Jean-François Breton, BP 9505, F-34196 Montpellier Cedex, France;2. Montpellier SupAgro, 2 place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier, France;1. The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia;2. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia;3. The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia;4. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, NE 69101, USA;5. Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia;6. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ), University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP 13418, Brazil |
| |
| Abstract: | Spray applications are most effective when they cover the greatest per unit area, improving target pest control. In order to optimize spray applications, nozzle companies have developed new designs that seek to provide the greatest and most uniform coverage per target unit area. While dual fan nozzles have been examined against single fan nozzles in several studies, there has not been a comprehensive comparison of multiple nominal flow rate and multiple dual fan nozzle types. This study sought to examine pressure, droplet size classification, and nozzle arrangement effects on droplet number density on horizontal artificial collectors using a fixed application rate. The relationship between coverage and nozzle type was significant (P < 0.001) as was the relationship between coverage and pressure (P < 0.001). The 207 kPa pressure resulted in the highest coverage for every nozzle type except the alternating TADFs (ATADF)s. The GAT 11003 resulted in the highest coverage overall with 39.6% at the 207 kPa pressure, followed by the TADF 11005 and TADF 11003 at 38.6% and 38.3% coverage respectively. The effect of pressure was significant for the droplet number density (P < 0.001) as was the effect on droplet number density from nozzle type (P < 0.001). The 414 kPa pressure resulted in the highest droplet number density for all nozzle types except the AITTJ 11003 and the MDD 11004. The GAT 11003 and GAT 11004 produced the highest overall droplet number densities with 73.0 and 72.6 droplets cm2 at the 414 kPa pressure. The GAT 11003 had the greatest droplet number density at every pressure. Nozzle arrangement has a significant effect on spray coverage with asymmetric dual fan nozzles, and it would be recommended to alternate these nozzles on a spray boom to increase coverage especially at higher application speeds. Results from this study show that an applicator can select a coarser droplet size classification without observable loss in coverage, while greatly reducing the drift potential of the application. |
| |
| Keywords: | Spray drift Kromekote Droplet deposition Image J Pesticide efficacy Nozzle |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
