首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

海南主栽槟榔品种鲜果性状评价
引用本文:黄丽云,刘立云,李艳,李杰.海南主栽槟榔品种鲜果性状评价[J].热带作物学报,2014,35(2):313-316.
作者姓名:黄丽云  刘立云  李艳  李杰
作者单位:中国热带农业科学院椰子研究所;中国热带农业科学院椰子研究所;中国热带农业科学院椰子研究所;中国热带农业科学院椰子研究所
基金项目:农业部热带作物种质资源保护项目“槟榔种质资源保护”(No. 13RZZY-17)。
摘    要:以3个海南主栽槟榔品种鲜果为试材,测定单果重、果形指数、槟榔碱、纤维量等8个经济性状,结合物性测定及口感鉴定进行综合评价分析。结果表明:(1)热研1号鲜果果形好,重要品质指标如槟榔碱和不溶性膳食纤维分别为0.51%和15.30%,与其它两个品种差异达极显著水平;(2)热研1号和本地种在果肉的质构分析中各项指标均差异不显著,台湾种在粘附性、内聚性和弹性等指标中与其它两个品种差异达极显著水平。结合硬度指标,表明台湾种鲜食口感不及其它两个品种;(3)通过感官评价鉴定,热研1号和海南本地种比台湾种的甜度高,但同时咀嚼热研1号槟榔具有强烈的兴奋作用,果实质地较软,较适宜用作加工青果。

关 键 词:槟榔品种  鲜果  性状评价

Evaluation of the Fresh Fruit of the Predominantly Cultivated Arecanut(Areca catechu L.)Varieties in Hainan Province
HUANG Liyun,LIU Liyun,LI Yan and LI Jie.Evaluation of the Fresh Fruit of the Predominantly Cultivated Arecanut(Areca catechu L.)Varieties in Hainan Province[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,2014,35(2):313-316.
Authors:HUANG Liyun  LIU Liyun  LI Yan and LI Jie
Institution:Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropic Agricultural Sciences;Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropic Agricultural Sciences;Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropic Agricultural Sciences;Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropic Agricultural Sciences
Abstract:Three main cultivated varieties of fresh fruit were used to study the indices analysis of economic characters(single fruit weight, fruit shape index, arecoline, fiber content and so on), texture analysis and sensory evaluation. The results showed that:(1)Reyan No. 1 had a good shape and some important quality indicators. The arecoline and insoluble dietary fiber was 0.51% and 15.30%, significantly different with the other two species;(2)There were not significant difference between Reyan No. 1 and the local betel nut in the flesh texture analysis ,but there were highly significant difference with the other two varieties in adhesiveness, cohesiveness and springiness indices between,Taiwan variety and the other varieties.. In combined with hardness index, Taiwan variety was inferior to the other two varieties in taste;(3)Through sensory evaluation, Reyan No. 1 and Hainan varieties were sweeter than Taiwan variety. Reyan No. 1 has a strong stimulant and soft texture, it is suitable for processing.
Keywords:Arecanut varieties  Fresh fruit  Evaluation index
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《热带作物学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《热带作物学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号