| 16个抗虫杨品种在林分补植中的性状差异比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵英铭,高君亮,杨文斌,黄雅茹,马迎宾,包春燕,张 格,李炜,吕永军,王志刚,刘芳,郝玉光. 16个抗虫杨品种在林分补植中的性状差异比较[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(3): 72-81. DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2016.468 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵英铭 高君亮 杨文斌 黄雅茹 马迎宾 包春燕 张 格 李炜 吕永军 王志刚 刘芳 郝玉光 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.中国林业科学研究院沙漠林业实验中心, 内蒙古 磴口 015200; 2.中国林业科学研究院荒漠化研究所, ;北京 100091; 3.国家林业局内蒙古磴口荒漠生态系统定位观测研究站, 内蒙古 磴口 015200;4.巴彦淖尔市科技局, 内蒙古 临河 015000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项（CAFYBB2017MB002；CAFYBB2014MA016；CAFYBB2012003）资助。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "三北"防护林退化严重,林分修复补植造林缺乏可供选择的生态适应性强、抗性优良的杨树新品种,尤其在干旱、半干旱区造林树种更加匮乏,加之光肩星天牛危害严重,选择抗性优良的树种亟需解决。基于此,2014年4月在乌兰布和沙漠绿洲布置了16个抗虫杨树品种进行林分修复补植过程中性状的比较,通过对16个杨树品种的保存率、抽梢率、胸径、树高、新梢等因子的调查,用单因子分析、交集法、聚类分析、综合评分的方法最终选出7个生态适应性和速生性均比较优良的杨树品种,并给予具体的排序和分值,08-09(59.30)08-01(61.28)08-14(61.48)京2(62.06)16-8(68.52)16-28(72.68)16-27(73.09)。
|
| 关 键 词： | 杨树品种 抗虫 性状比较 林分修复 多种分析方法 |
Comparison of 16 Agronomic Characters of Different Insect Species in Poplar Stand Replanting |
| |
| ZHAO Yingming,GAO Junliang,YANG Wenbin,HUANG Yaru,MA Yingbin. Comparison of 16 Agronomic Characters of Different Insect Species in Poplar Stand Replanting[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(3): 72-81. DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2016.468 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Yingming GAO Junliang YANG Wenbin HUANG Yaru MA Yingbin |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.Institute of Desertification Studies, CAF, Beijing 100091; 2.Experimental Center of Desert Forestry, Chinese Academy of ;Forestry, Inner Mongolia Dengkou, 015200; 3.Inner Mongolia Dengkou Desert Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry ;Administration, Inner Mongolia Dengkou, 015200; 4.Bayannaoer Technology Bureau, Inner Mongolia Linhe 015000, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to offer new varieties of poplar for arid, semi-arid region afforestation and the “three north areas” shelter belt repairing, 16 varieties of insect-resistant poplar comparison test were arranged in the Ulan Buh Desert Oasis in 2014 April. Based on survey results of 16 species′ poplar, saving rate, sprouting rate, diameter, height, the new branch length and other factors, single factor analysis, intersection, cluster analysis, comprehensive scoring method were used in this paper,and eventually selected 7 ecological adaptability and fast-growth poplar species that were relatively good, and give specific sequencing and score, 08-09（59.30）<08-01（61.28）<08-14（61.48）
|
| |
| Keywords: | poplar species insect compare characters stand repair a variety of assays |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国农业科技导报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《中国农业科技导报》下载全文 |
|
