首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

北方农牧交错带不同管理类型下草场治理效果研究
引用本文:王晓,张克斌,苏鹏飞,顾岚. 北方农牧交错带不同管理类型下草场治理效果研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(6): 180-183
作者姓名:王晓  张克斌  苏鹏飞  顾岚
作者单位:北京林业大学 水土保持和荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室, 北京 100083
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“半荒漠湿地植被群落时空分布特征研究”,国家林业局项目“盐池荒漠化定位监测”
摘    要:采用样方法选取6块草场:老封育草场(E)、中封育草场(E1)、新封育草场(E2)、天然草场(TR)、退耕还草(TG)和撂荒地(LH)对宁夏盐池不同管理类型下的的草场治理效果进行了研究.以重要值为基础,通过α多样性指数、β多样性指数以及生物量的比较,对不同管理类型下的草场治理效果进行综合评价.结果表明:(1) 不同草场类型中,天然草场由于人为干扰较小,SW多样性指数、SP优势度指数均为最好,均匀度指数以退耕还草为最大;(2) 退耕还草的群落组成最接近于天然草场;(3) 不同草场的地上生物量中,最大的为退耕还草,其次为天然草场,在围栏封育草场中,老封育区的地上生物量是最小的.围栏封育和退耕还草在当地草场恢复中都是行之有效的方式.随着围栏封育年限的延长,草场出现退化现象,其各多样性指标都比早期封育时低.相比较于围栏封育,退耕还草在当地的优越性更加明显.

关 键 词:α多样性指数α多样性指数  β多样性指数β多样性指数  生物量  草场管理  草地退化

Survey on the Effects of Management Alteration on Grassland in Agropastural Ecotone of North China
WANG Xiao,ZHANG Ke-bin,SU Peng-fei,GU Lan. Survey on the Effects of Management Alteration on Grassland in Agropastural Ecotone of North China[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 19(6): 180-183
Authors:WANG Xiao  ZHANG Ke-bin  SU Peng-fei  GU Lan
Affiliation:Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract:Method of sampling plot has been used to investigate treatment effects of different management categories on grassland in Yanchi, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Six kinds of grasslands have been selected, which were early-time enclosed grassland (E), middle-time enclosed grassland (E1), newly enclosed grassland (E2), natural grassland(TR), grain for green land(TG) and abandoned land(LH). On the basis of important value, evaluation in improvement of grassland environment has been done through α-diversity index, β-diversity index and biomass effectiveness. The results showed that: (1) due to little human disturbances, natural grassland performanced the best in terms of SW-diversity index and SP-dominance index compared with the others, and grain for green land has the biggest evenness index; (2) on the study of grassland similar test, community composition of grain for green land was most likely to natural grassland; (3) based on the study of biomass, grain for green land achieves the highest biomass, biomass of natural land was ranked as the second. Among fencing grasslands, early-time enclosed grassland had the lowest aboveground biomass. As a result, fencing and grain for green were effective methods to generate grassland restoration. As fencing time went by, grassland came to degradation with the sign that diversity indices turn to decrease compared with early time. Method of grain for green behaved significantly better than fencing.
Keywords:α-diversity index  β-diversity index  biomass  grassland management  grassland degradation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水土保持研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水土保持研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号