首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同耕作方式和工作深度对玉米生产的影响
引用本文:罗锡文. 不同耕作方式和工作深度对玉米生产的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 1999, 20(2): 85-90
作者姓名:罗锡文
作者单位:华南农业大学工程技术学院,广州,510642
摘    要:为了比较不同耕作方式和工作深度对玉米生产的影响,在华南农业大学农场进行了两组对比试验,试验土壤为沙壤土和粘壤土,试验作物为玉米。第一组试验中安排了5种耕作方式,分别为犁耕加圆盘耙(MB+DH),凿形耕(CH),圆盘耙两次(DH2),旋耕(RT)和不耕(NT),第二组试验中安排了2种耕作方式,犁耕加圆盘耙(NDL)和犁耕、圆盘耙加深松(NL)。试验结果表明,不同的耕作方式和工作深度对土壤容重、土壤耕

关 键 词:玉米生产  耕作方式  耕作深度

The Effect of Different TillageManagement and Working Depth on Maize Production
Suliman A. Elnazif,Suliman A. Elnazif,Luo Xiwen. The Effect of Different TillageManagement and Working Depth on Maize Production[J]. JOURNAL OF SOUTH CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, 1999, 20(2): 85-90
Authors:Suliman A. Elnazif  Suliman A. Elnazif  Luo Xiwen
Abstract:This research was conducted to study the effect of different tillage management systems (TMS) and working depth on maize production. The TMS used in experiment 1 were moldboard + disc harrow (MB+DH), chisel (CH), disc harrow twice (DH2), rotovator (RT) and no-tillage (NT) as a control. This experiment was conducted on a sandy loam soil. The results showed highly significant differences between treatments. The chisel (CH) significantly influenced maize growth parameters, reduced soil bulk density, soil tillage resistance, increased soil moisture at all depths and finally gave higher maize yield and yield components parameters while the no-tillage (NT) treatment gave the lowest performance. Experiment 2 was conducted on a clay soil with two treatments, no deep loosening (NDL) 20 cm depth and deep loosening (DL) 40 cm depth using tine. The results showed that the deep loosening significantly increased soil moisture, reduced soil bulk density, soil tillage resistance and finally increased maize production.
Keywords:maize production  tillage  soil management systems
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《华南农业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《华南农业大学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号