首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Effects of biological,economic and management factors on tuna and billfish stock status
Authors:Maite Pons  Trevor A Branch  Michael C Melnychuk  Olaf P Jensen  Jon Brodziak  Jean M Fromentin  Shelton J Harley  Alan C Haynie  Laurie T Kell  Mark N Maunder  Ana M Parma  Victor R Restrepo  Rishi Sharma  Robert Ahrens  Ray Hilborn
Institution:1. School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;2. Department of Marine & Coastal Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA;3. NOAA Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, Honolulu, HI, USA;4. Ifremer, UMR MARBEC (Marine Biodiversity, exploitation and conservation), boulevard Jean Monnet, 34203 Sète Cedex, France;5. Fisheries, Aquaculture and Marine Ecosystems Division, Secretariat of the Pacific Community, 98848 Noumea, New Caledonia;6. NOAA Fisheries, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA, USA;7. ICCAT (International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas) Secretariat, 28002 Madrid, Spain;8. IATTC (Inter‐American Tropical Tuna Commission), San Diego, CA, USA;9. Centro Nacional Patagónico – CONICET, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina;10. ISSF (International Seafood Sustainability foundation), Washington, DC, USA;11. IOTC (Indian Ocean Tuna Commission), Victoria, Mahé, Seychelles;12. Program of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Abstract:Commercial tunas and billfishes (swordfish, marlins and sailfish) provide considerable catches and income in both developed and developing countries. These stocks vary in status from lightly exploited to rebuilding to severely depleted. Previous studies suggested that this variability could result from differences in life‐history characteristics and economic incentives, but differences in exploitation histories and management measures also have a strong effect on current stock status. Although the status (biomass and fishing mortality rate) of major tuna and billfish stocks is well documented, the effect of these diverse factors on current stock status and the effect of management measures in rebuilding stocks have not been analysed at the global level. Here, we show that, particularly for tunas, stocks were more depleted if they had high commercial value, were long‐lived species, had small pre‐fishing biomass and were subject to intense fishing pressure for a long time. In addition, implementing and enforcing total allowable catches (TACs) had the strongest positive influence on rebuilding overfished tuna and billfish stocks. Other control rules such as minimum size regulations or seasonal closures were also important in reducing fishing pressure, but stocks under TAC implementations showed the fastest increase of biomass. Lessons learned from this study can be applied in managing large industrial fisheries around the world. In particular, tuna regional fisheries management organizations should consider the relative effectiveness of management measures observed in this study for rebuilding depleted large pelagic stocks.
Keywords:Fisheries management  marine conservation  stock assessment  stock status  tuna fisheries
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号