复合井修复地下水硝酸盐污染的效果

为探寻更适用于农田周边硝酸盐污染地下水的原位生物修复技术,该研究构建了A、B、C3套试验装置,分别刻画管井(A)、大口井与管井组成的复合井(B、C)。基于3套物理试验模型,定量对比分析了管井与复合井修复地下水硝酸盐污染的效果。结果表明:受水力停留时间的影响,相同流速条件下,A、B、C三套修复系统的硝酸盐负荷分别介于75～100、100～125、125～150 mg/L之间;在允许硝酸盐负荷范围内,去除率均可达到95%以上,且不会出现亚硝酸盐累积及氨氮超标现象,表明了复合井修复系统的可行性,可以实现地下水开采与修复同步进行,提高了地下水水源地供水安全保证率。

Remediation effects of compound well on nitrate pollution in groundwater

Abstract: Nitrate pollution has posed a great threat to groundwater near farmlands, due mainly to the long-term agricultural fertilization and soil microorganisms. Nitrates with strong migration ability have entered the zone of saturation along with water movement. High concentrations of nitrates are directly detrimental to the safety of groundwater source areas. In this study, three systems A, B, and C were constructed to explore an in-situ bioremediation technology for the detection of nitrate-contaminated groundwater around farmland. Every system consisted of wells, storage tanks, and peristaltic pumps. System A was used to simulate a tube well with a diameter of 7 cm. System B and C were used to simulate compound wells, where there were a large well with a diameter of 14 cm and a tube well with a diameter of 7 cm. Every tube well was filled with fine sand in the same volume and height, where the height of fine sand was 12cm. The large diameter wells in system B and C were filled with fine sand with the heights of 4 cm and 8 cm, respectively. Both tube wells and large wells were used to simulate the complete penetration wells. The bottom of the wells was sealed, where water flowed in from the side walls. The peristaltic pumps were installed on the top of wells to simulate water pumping. The volume ratio of the reaction medium was 1:2:3 in three systems. The ratio of hydraulic retention time was also 1:2:4 under the same flow rate. The biofilm was naturally domesticated. Ethanol was used as the carbon source. A total of 6 groups were set in the reaction stage, including 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 mg/L, according to the concentration gradients of nitrate nitrogen. The test results showed that the microorganisms in the reaction medium could basically select the dominant strains within one day when the nitrate concentration increased instantaneously, leading to match the changes in nitrate loading conditions for the better denitrification capacity. In-situ bioremediation systems were also constructed with compound wells including tube wells and large diameter wells, in order to repair nitrate-contaminated groundwater and the nitrate loading of every system. The nitrate loadings of three remediation systems A-C were 75-100 mg/L, 100-125 mg/L, and 125-150 mg/L at the flow rate of 0.26 m/d. The removal rate of remediation systems reached more than 95% within nitrate loading. There was no accumulation of nitrite and excessive ammonia nitrogen, indicating the feasibility of repair systems with compound wells. Groundwater mining and remediation were carried out simultaneously without the need to cut off agricultural non-point source pollution, indicating high security for groundwater source area. In addition, a combination of tube wells and large diameter wells can be installed to compound wells with a relatively simple well drilling (including phreatic water and confined water). The diameter of wells and height of the reaction medium can be adjusted for better removal of nitrates, according to the thickness of the aquifer, the amount of water demand, and the level of nitrate-contaminated groundwater. Physical test models were used to determine the nitrate loading intervals of three remediation systems. In the future work, the hydrogeochemical model will be established to accurately determine the maximum nitrate loadings of repair systems with compound wells, together with the influence of medium heterogeneity on the remediation performance.