首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

18个品种蓝靛果营养成分分析及综合品质评价
引用本文:姜璐, 包怡红, 贾雨彤, 赖章飞, 徐福成. 18个品种蓝靛果营养成分分析及综合品质评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(7): 326-335. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.07.036
作者姓名:姜璐  包怡红  贾雨彤  赖章飞  徐福成
作者单位:1.东北林业大学林学院,哈尔滨 150040;2.黑龙江省森林食品资源利用重点实验室,哈尔滨 150040;3.黑河市中俄林业科技合作园区,黑河 164300
基金项目:黑龙江省"百千万"工程科技重大专项(2020ZX07B01-3)
摘    要:为了研究不同品种蓝靛果各指标的差异,确定影响其品质的关键指标,对不同品种蓝靛果进行综合评价并分类。以18个品种蓝靛果为研究对象,基于百粒质量、可溶性固形物含量、含水率、总酸、可溶性糖、糖酸比、总酚、总黄酮、花色苷、维生素C、铁、钙、感官评分、胰脂肪酶抑制率等各项指标的差异,通过相关性分析、主成分分析,建立一套综合评价蓝靛果品质的方法,并结合热图聚类分析将18个品种的蓝靛果进行分类,根据各类蓝靛果特点分析其潜在应用方向。测定结果显示不同品种蓝靛果多项指标存在显著差异(P<0.05),经各指标之间相关性分析可得总酸与总酚、总黄酮以及花色苷含量之间呈显著正相关(P<0.05),胰脂肪酶抑制率与总酸含量呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与花色苷含量呈显著正相关(P<0.05),感官评分与百粒质量呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。经主成分分析,提取出5个主成分,累计贡献率达84.524%,总酸、总酚、总黄酮、花色苷含量以及胰脂肪酶抑制率是评价蓝靛果品质的关键指标。根据综合评价函数计算综合得分,排名前五的品种分别是

关 键 词:主成分分析  聚类分析  水果  蓝靛果  综合评价
收稿时间:2021-11-28
修稿时间:2022-01-15

Nutritional component analysis and comprehensive quality evaluation of 18 different varieties of Lonicera caerulea
Jiang Lu, Bao Yihong, Jia Yutong, Lai Zhangfei, Xu Fucheng. Nutritional component analysis and comprehensive quality evaluation of 18 different varieties of Lonicera caerulea[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(7): 326-335. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.07.036
Authors:Jiang Lu  Bao Yihong  Jia Yutong  Lai Zhangfei  Xu Fucheng
Affiliation:1.College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China;2.Key Laboratory of Forest Food Resources Utilization of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150040, China;3.Science and Technology Cooperation Garden of China-Russia Forestry in Heihe, Heihe 164300, China
Abstract:Lonicera caerulea is one of the fruits rich in vitamins, active substances, and minerals for the antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant. The breeding can be relatively late in recent years, leading to the relatively scarce product development for Lonicera caerulea in China. Moreover, Lonicera caerulea can vary outstandingly in its various varieties. There is no systematic evaluation of the quality of Lonicera caerulea at present. This study aims to determine the key indicators of the quality for the systematic evaluation and classification of the different varieties of Lonicera caerulea. Taking 18 varieties of Lonicera caerulea as the research object, some indicators were selected to clarify the differences in 100-grain weight, soluble solid content, moisture, total acid, soluble sugar, sugar-acid ratio, total phenol, total flavonoids, anthocyanin, vitamin C, iron, calcium, sensory evaluation, and pancreatic lipase inhibition rate. A comprehensive evaluation of Lonicera caerulea quality was established by correlation analysis and principal component analysis. 18 varieties of Lonicera caerulea were classified by the heat map clustering analysis, according to the characteristics of various Lonicera caerulea. The potential application direction was also analyzed after the evaluation. The results showed that there were significant differences in each index of different varieties of Lonicera caerulea (P<0.05). The correlation analysis between each index showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the contents of total acids, total phenols, total flavonoids, and anthocyanin (P< 0.05). The inhibition rate of pancreatic lipase was significantly positively correlated with the total acid content (P<0.01), and the anthocyanin content (P<0.05), respectively. The sensory evaluation score was significantly positively correlated with the 100-seed weight (P<0.05). Five principal components were extracted by principal component analysis, where the cumulative contribution rate was 84.524 %. The contents of total acids, total phenols, total flavonoids, anthocyanins, and pancreatic lipase inhibition rate were the key indicators to evaluate the quality of Lonicera caerulea. According to the comprehensive evaluation function, the top five varieties were Serena (42.38), Beilei (41.04), Beleri (39.26), Ulan (35.38), and Charcoal fire (34.56). These five varieties presented excellent quality for the new varieties or directional breeding. The 18 varieties of Lonicera caerulea were divided into I, II, and III groups by the heat map clustering analysis, each containing 4, 5, and 9 varieties. Specifically, type I Lonicera caerulea was suitable for the fresh food, type II Lonicera caerulea was for the developing health food with auxiliary lipid-lowering function, and type III Lonicera caerulea was for the development of leisure food, where the Asori, 1-100-82, 33-11-82 and Blue spindle were suitable for the developing juice, and wine, as well as the soft blue, Iliad, Tomicka, Waxiugang and Charcoal fire were suitable for the processing jam, preserved fruit and canned products. This finding can provide a strong reference for the directional breeding in the development and utilization of different varieties of Lonicera caerulea. A systematic and reliable evaluation can be widely expected to serve as the quality analysis and comprehensive classification of Lonicera caerulea.
Keywords:principal component analysis (PCA)   cluster analysis   fruits   Lonicera caerulea   comprehensive evaluation
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号