首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Tillage Tool Design by the Finite Element Method: Part 2. Experimental Validation of the Finite Element Results with Soil Bin Test
Institution:1. Institute of Agricultural Engineering, PANNON Agricultural University, H-9200, Mosonmagyaróvár, Vár 2, Hungary;2. Institute of Agricultural Machinery, Technical University of Munich, D-80290, München, Germany;1. Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania;2. Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Joniškėlis Experimental Station, Lithuania;1. Biosystems Engineering Department, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran;2. Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord 88186-34141, Iran;3. Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Jahrom University, PO BOX 74135-111, Jahrom, Iran
Abstract:Laboratory soil bin tests of subsoiler cutting in a sandy loam soil were carried out in order to validate the results obtained from the finite element calculations reported in Part 1 of this study. Measured results of subsoiler draught force and soil failure dimension taken on the surface were presented for four combinations of the subsoiler shank rake angle and chisel angle. Soil bin tests also measured the variation of draught force with subsoiler displacement. It was observed that the angle of both the subsoiler parts affected the dimensions of the surface soil failure and the magnitude of subsoiler draught force.Finite element method predictions of the subsoiler draught force as well as the extent of surface soil failure agreed well with measurements made in the soil bin. The predicted draught force for all subsoiler types exceeded the measured ones. The overprediction error ranged from 11·76 to 20·04%. The finite element model provided a good approximation to the maximum upward soil movement for the experiments. Better finite element method predictions of the front soil failure was obtained for the two subsoiler designs with a small chisel angle of 15° than for the designs with chisel angles of 23 and 31°. Among the four investigated subsoiler types the best subsoiler design was devised, which required the lowest draught and developed good soil loosening qualities as estimated by soil volume change. This subsoiler had a shank of 75° rake angle and an inclined chisel of 15° angle. Keeping a good soil loosening performance was attributed to the smaller shank rake angle of 75°, which indicated that the shank played an important role for the determination of the quality of soil loosening.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号