Interactions of agrochemicals applied to peanut; part 1: Effects on herbicides |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Crop Science, Box 7620, 100 Derieux Place, 4207 Williams Hall, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States;2. Department of Plant Pathology, Box 7616, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States;3. Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States;4. Department of Horticultural Science, Box 7609, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States;1. Centro Nacional de Epidemiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España;2. Servei de Vigilància Epidemiològica i Resposta a Emergències de Salut Pública a Lleida i Alt Pirineu i Aran, Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya, Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Lleida, España;3. CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España;1. Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Sunchon National University, 255 Jungang-ro, Sunchon, Jeonnam 540-742, Republic of Korea;2. Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Science, 42 Jebong-ro Donggu, Gwangju 501-757, Republic of Korea;3. Korea Cardiovascular Stent Institute of Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;4. Bioalpha Co. Ltd., Seongnam, Republic of Korea;1. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey;2. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey;3. Narlıdere Nursing Home, Elderly Care and Rehabilitation Center, İzmir, Turkey;4. Department of Family Medicine, Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey;5. Rize No. 1 Family Health Center, Rize, Turkey;6. Department of Family Medicine, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey;7. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey;8. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey;9. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, Sanlıurfa, Turkey;1. College of Pharmacy, Xinxiang Medical University, 453003, Xinxiang, PR China;2. College of Sanquan, Xinxiang Medical University, 453003, Xinxiang, PR China;3. Tianjin Engineering and Technology Research Institute, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin, 300300, PR China;1. College of Pharmacy, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Daejeon Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang Bone Regeneration Research Institute, Wonkwang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea |
| |
| Abstract: | Numerous agrochemicals are applied in peanut production systems. Field and laboratory experiments were conducted in North Carolina to characterize biological and physicochemical interactions when the herbicides clethodim, imazapic, imazethapyr, lactofen, sethoxydim, and 2,4-DB were applied in combination with adjuvants, fungicides, insecticides, and micronutrients. A wide range of interactions was noted when comparing across herbicides, weed species, and agrochemical combinations. There was little consistency across weed species for a herbicide or across herbicides for a weed species when comparing significant main effects and interactions. In most instances, when compared with the standard herbicide treatment and adjuvant applied alone, herbicide efficacy was not affected in the presence of other agrochemicals. Changes in solution pH and formation of precipitates varied according to the herbicide combinations used. Boron, manganese, and 2,4-DB often caused dramatic changes in solution pH. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
