Effects of pre- and post-harvest spray with glyphosate and partial cutting on growth and quality of aspen regeneration in a boreal mixedwood forest |
| |
Authors: | Rongzhou Man James A. Rice |
| |
Affiliation: | a Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Forest Research Institute, 1235 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5 b Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Forest Policy Section, Suite 400, 70 Foster Drive, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 6V5 c 1807 Thistleleaf Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1C 5W4 d Provincial Key Laboratory of Forestry and Ecological Environment, Forestry College of Beihua University, 3999 Huashan Road, Jilin City, Jilin Province 132013, China |
| |
Abstract: | In the boreal forest, conifer release treatments can leave a low quality hardwood component, which does not contribute to healthy, productive mixedwood forests. In this study, the growth and quality of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) regeneration were examined 5-7 years after spraying with glyphosate herbicide before and after harvesting. Results were compared to those from a partial cut and clearcut treatment without herbicide treatments. The preharvest spray treatment effectively reduced aspen density and height but did not lower regeneration quality—assessed by stem and crown deformation and stem stain—compared to the postharvest spray and clearcut treatments. Increased stem stain in the postharvest spray treatment was largely associated with the stem section that grew prior to herbicide application—post-herbicide growth was not affected. While the effect of stem stain may be restricted to growth that occurred before herbicide use, stem deformation from stem dieback may have longer term effects. In the partial cut treatments both density and stocking of aspen regeneration were lower, but aspen basal diameter growth, height growth, and quality were similar to those in the clearcut treatment. Thus, preharvest spray should promote conifer growth by reducing the density and growth of aspen regeneration without reducing the quality of aspen; this should be considered a preferred treatment to support for management objectives calling for productive and healthy mixtures of fast-growing aspen and slow-growing conifers. |
| |
Keywords: | Stem stain Deformation Herbicide Density Growth increment Mixedwood management |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|