华中农业大学校园环境质量两级模糊综合评价

在分层抽样问卷调查的基础上,运用方差分析、因子分析及模糊综合评判等方法对华中农业大学校园环境质量主观评价因子进行了具体分析.方差分析结果表明:不同成长环境的学生对"校内的交通体系"和"文娱场所适用性"等因子的评价结果有显著差异,而对其它因子的评价结果没有显著差异;不同性别的学生对"总体环境品质"、"宿舍适用性评价"和"到教室时间满意度"等因子的评价结果有显著差异,而对其它因子的评价结果没有显著差异;不同专业的学生对大多数因子的评价结果有显著或极显著差异.因子分析结果为:对23个因子进行旋转因子分析从而得到主成分、并依次命名为交通可达性因子、总体环境意象因子、建筑适用性因子、校园生活环境因子及物理环境因子.模糊评价结果表明:该校的环境质量主观评定等级为"一般"至"好".

Two-grade Indistinct Evaluation of the Environment Quality of Huazhong Agricultural University Campus

Based on the data obtained by stratification sampling questionnaire sheets sent to students of Huazhong Agricultural University, a study was made of the environment quality evaluation factors of this university campus. The results show that there are obvious differences in evaluating 'the campus traffic system' and 'entertainment place applicability', but there are not obvious differences about other evaluation factors among students with different growth backgrounds; that there are obvious differences in evaluating 'general environment quality', 'dormitory applicability' and 'satisfaction degree to the time spent on going to classroom', but there are no obvious differences about other evaluation factors between male and female students; and that there are obvious differences about most of the evaluation factors among different speciality students. 23 evaluation factors components were extracted by means of rotation factor analysis and they are named respectively as follows: Traffic Reach Component, General Environment Impression Component, Building Applicability Component, Campus Living Component and Campus Physical Component. The result of Comprehensive Indistinct Evaluation shows that the environment quality of this university campus should be the grade "common" to the grade "good".