Arthroscopic visualisation of the third metacarpal and metatarsal condyles in the horse |
| |
Authors: | K. Vanderperren A. Martens H. Haers L. Duchateau J. H. Saunders |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging and Small Animal Orthopaedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium;2. Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium;3. Department of Physiology and Biometrics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | Reasons for performing study: Arthroscopy of the fetlock joints is a routine surgical procedure in the horse. It is unclear how much of the articular surface of the condyles of the metacarpal (MCIII)/metatarsal (MTIII) bone can be visualised using either the dorsal or palmar/plantar arthroscopic approach. Objectives: To investigate which part of the articular surface of the MCIII/MTIII condyles of the fetlock joints can be evaluated arthroscopically using: 1) dorsal approach in combination with flexion; 2) standard palmar/plantar approach; or 3) additional portal at the base of the sesamoid bone with joint extension. Methods: All 3 arthroscopic approaches were performed on 20 fore‐ and 20 hindlimbs of 14 cadavers. For each approach, a curette was inserted ipsilaterally to create a lesion at the most distal part of the condyle that could be seen. After disarticulation and placement of a nail in each lesion, the maximally reachable angle was calculated on a perfect lateromedial radiograph. The 0° angle was determined as the distal crossing of the best fitting circle around the condyle with a line parallel to the dorsal MCIII/MTIII bone running through the circle centre (positive angle dorsal to 0°, negative palmar/plantar to 0°). Results: Using the dorsal approach with flexion, a significantly larger area of visualisation was present in the hind‐ (?23.4°) compared to the forelimb (+2.7°). Using the palmar/plantar approach (fore: ?60.4°; hind: ?70.7°) and the approach at the base of the sesamoid bone (fore: ?36.3°; hind: ?47.6°) more cartilage could be seen in the fore‐ compared to the hindlimb. When combining the 3 approaches, the remaining nonvisible part measured 38.9° in the fore‐ and 24.2° in the hindlimb, both located palmaro/plantarodistally. Conclusions: The use of dorsal and palmar/plantar arthroscopic approaches in combination with flexion and extension of the fetlock joint allows visualisation of the majority of the cartilage of the MCIII/MTIII condyles. The nonvisible section is smaller in the hindlimb compared to the forelimb. Potential relevance: Knowledge of the specific areas of visualisation of the condyles on arthroscopy is important for both diagnostic and therapeutic planning of fetlock disorders. |
| |
Keywords: | horse metacarpophalangeal metatarsophalangeal arthroscopy cartilage |
|
|