The regulation of biological control of weeds in Europe – an evolving landscape |
| |
Authors: | R. Shaw U. Schaffner E. Marchante |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. CABI UK, Egham, Surrey, TW20 9TY (UK);2. CABI Switzerland, 2800, Delémont, (Switzerland);3. Department of Life Sciences, Centre for Functional Ecology, University of Coimbra, 3000 · 456 Coimbra, (Portugal) |
| |
Abstract: | After a difficult start, classical biological control of weeds is becoming recognized as an option for management of invasive plants in European Union (EU) Member States with intentional releases in three countries over the past 5 years. Many European countries are benefitting from the presence of Stenopelmus rufinasus, the azolla weevil, which has been accidentally introduced to the region. However, the UK experience with the official release of the psyllid Aphalara itadori against Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) and the subsequent release of the rust Puccinia komarovii var glanduliferae against Impatiens glandulifera showed the regulatory framework that could be followed by EU Member States. This process was followed in advance of the subsequent release of Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae, a specific Australian bud‐galling wasp, against the invasive Acacia longifolia in Portugal. Soon the case of Ophraella communa, another accidental introduction that is severely limiting Ambrosia artemisiifolia populations, will influence affected countries, some of which have been uninterested in this technique until now, to consider the advantages and disadvantages of classical biocontrol. The future looks bright for classical weed biocontrol and the EU Regulation on Invasive Species should further aid this situation. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|