首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论司法公正理念之漂移——程序正义与实体正义比较分析
引用本文:赵谦.论司法公正理念之漂移——程序正义与实体正义比较分析[J].四川畜牧兽医学院学报,2006,4(1):58-61.
作者姓名:赵谦
作者单位:西南大学人文学院,重庆北碚400716
摘    要:程序正义和实体正义是司法公正的两个方面。实体正义以遵循程序正义为前提,程序正义是实体正义的常规手段。实体正义本身含有诸多不确定因素,程序正义同时具有相对的独立性和稳定性。程序正义对实体正义的实现具有保障作用。在实体正义和程序正义碰撞下,应倾向程序正义。

关 键 词:程序正义  实体正义  不确定性  独立性  稳定性
文章编号:1672-5379(2006)01-0058-04
收稿时间:2005-11-29

ON THE DRIFTING OF THE IDEA OF JUDICIAL JUSTICE --A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE
ZHAO Qian.ON THE DRIFTING OF THE IDEA OF JUDICIAL JUSTICE --A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE[J].Journal of Sichuan Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine,2006,4(1):58-61.
Authors:ZHAO Qian
Abstract:Procedural justice and substantial justice are the two sides of the justice of the legal system. The procedural justice is the precondition of substantial justice and the normal promise of it. The substantial justice comprises lots of uncertain elements, whereas the procedural justice is characterized by independency and stability. The former is the supervisor to the latter. When a conflict exists between them, it should be correct to support the procedural justice.
Keywords:procedural justice  substantial justice  uncertainty  independency  stability
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号