An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania

Past work ascribing priorities for the selection of nature reserves has weighted attributes and applied formulae in a single stage process. This single application of a formula means that areas of differing priority may contain similar mixes of species, communities or habitats, and may thus lead to imbalance in representation when preservation takes place, with some previously unpreserved or poorly preserved species, communities or habitats being found in several of the new reserves, and others being absent. An iterative method that has been applied to assess priorities for the preservation of threatened species in the central east coast of Tasmania overcomes this difficulty. The area with the highest score in the initial stages of analysis is assumed to be preserved and the weightings of attributes are altered accordingly. These new weightings are applied to locate the area of next highest priority, and the process continues until predetermined preservation goals are met.