首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

最高人民法院司法解释的法律效力问题——论法发[2007]12号第五条的合法性
引用本文:张三保. 最高人民法院司法解释的法律效力问题——论法发[2007]12号第五条的合法性[J]. 信阳农业高等专科学校学报, 2007, 17(3): 35-38
作者姓名:张三保
作者单位:华侨大学,法学院,福建,泉州,362021
摘    要:最高人民法院的司法解释是一个极具中国特色的司法现象,其法律效力是一个敏感的话题。尽管现行法律和“高法”的司法解释统属于中国正式法范畴,但毕竟法律是中国法的直接渊源。最高人民法院无权用司法解释来规定司法解释的法律效力,更无权将其司法解释界定为具有法律效力。最高人民法院只能针对审判工作中具体应用法律、法令的问题做出司法解释且不能与法律相抵触。

关 键 词:司法解释  法律效力  合法性
文章编号:1008-4916(2007)03-0035-04
修稿时间:2007-06-03

On the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People''''s Court in China——Suspect legality of article 5 of FaFa[2007]No.12
ZHANG San-bao. On the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People''''s Court in China——Suspect legality of article 5 of FaFa[2007]No.12[J]. Journal of Xinyang Agricultural College, 2007, 17(3): 35-38
Authors:ZHANG San-bao
Affiliation:Law school, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China
Abstract:The judicial interpretation of the Supreme People' s Court is a kind of legal phenomena with Chinese characteristic. It' s a sensitive topic about its force. Although the existing laws and the Supreme People' s Court' s judicial interpretation belongs to the chinese official law category, the existing law is a direct source of the law after all. the Supreme People's Court has no fights to define the forces of the judicial interpretation by itself,especially can't award legal force to the judicial interpretation equally with law from the "Perspective of the source of right of making the judicial interpretation . The Supreme People' s Court can only interpret the problems of how to use law to judge cases and its interpretation can not conflict with law.
Keywords:judicial interpretation   legal force    legality
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号