首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Effect of fruit load on oil yield components and dynamics of fruit growth and oil accumulation in olive (Olea europaea L.)
Authors:Eduardo R Trentacoste  Carlos M Puertas  Víctor O Sadras
Institution:1. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria), Mendoza, Argentina;2. South Australian Research and Development Institute, Waite Campus, Australia;1. Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica de La Rioja (CRILAR-CONICET), Entre Ríos y Mendoza s/n, Anillaco (5301), La Rioja, Argentina;2. IFEVA, CONICET/Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, C.A. Buenos Aires (C1417DSE), Argentina;1. Department of Plant Sciences, Institute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Reclamation, 21000 Split, Croatia;2. Department of Plant Nutrition, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagreb 10000, Croatia;1. Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture, California State University, Chico, Chico, CA 95929-0310, United States;2. University of California, Davis, Cooperative Extension Glenn County, PO Box 697, 821 E. South Street, Orland, CA 95963, United States;3. Plant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States;4. Entomology Department, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States;5. California Olive Ranch, 1367 E Lassen Ave, Chico, CA 95973, United States;1. CEIGRAM/Dpto. Producción agraria, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain;2. INTA. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín, Mendoza, Argentina;1. Agencia de Extensión Rural Aimogasta, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Ruta Nacional 60, Aimogasta, La Rioja, 5310, Argentina;2. Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible—CSIC, Av. Menéndez Pidal S/N, Campus Alameda del Obispo, Córdoba, 14004, Spain;3. Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, 43 Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis, 1082, Tunisia;4. Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica de La Rioja (CRILAR-Provincia de La Rioja-UNLaR-SEGEMAR-UNCa-CONICET), Entre Ríos y Mendoza S/N, Anillaco, La Rioja, 5301, Argentina;1. Environmental Physics and Irrigation, Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization – Volcani, Gilat Research Center, Israel;2. Soil Chemistry, Plant Nutrition and Microbiology, Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization – Volcani, Gilat Research Center, Israel;3. Fruit Tree Sciences, Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization – Volcani, Gilat Research Center, Israel;4. National Agricultural Research Center, Jordan
Abstract:Olive oil yield and its components (fruit number, average fruit weight and fruit oil concentration) depend on crop load and source–sink ratios as affected by environmental conditions, management and the alternate bearing typical of the species. The aims of this work were to: (i) establish quantitative relationships between oil yield and its components as affected by fruit load in a high-yielding production system, (ii) analyse the dynamics of fruit weight and fruit oil concentration in terms of rates and durations, and (iii) explore the relationships between the dynamics of oil and water in fruit. In a fully irrigated olive orchard in Mendoza (32° S), Argentina, cv. Arbequina trees with similar crown volume and three fruit loads (3-fold range) were monitored during two seasons. Oil yield was positively associated with both fruit number and fruit fresh weight, but not with fruit oil concentration. Across seasons and fruit loads, fruit yield increased linearly with fruit number at ~1.5 kg per thousand fruit and reached a maximum ~60 kg tree?1 (or 25 t ha?1) at a fruit load of 32,700 fruit tree?1. The fruit filling rate was affected by fruit load, while the duration of fruit growth and the dynamics of oil and water concentration were unaffected by fruit load. Fruit water concentration reached a minimum at the onset of Stage III of fruit growth, which was marked by a rapid increase in oil concentration. Fruit fresh weight and oil weight increased with source–sink ratio from ~0.5 up to a threshold ~2 m3 crown per thousand fruit. In contrast, a 8-fold range of source–sink ratio did not affect fruit oil concentration.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号