首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

减氮配施控释尿素对水稻产量和氮肥利用的影响
引用本文:黄巧义,唐拴虎,张发宝,张木,黄旭,黄建凤,李苹,付弘婷.减氮配施控释尿素对水稻产量和氮肥利用的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(6):829-838.
作者姓名:黄巧义  唐拴虎  张发宝  张木  黄旭  黄建凤  李苹  付弘婷
作者单位:广东省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所/农业部南方植物营养与肥料重点实验室/广东省养分资源循环利用与耕地保育重点实验室 广州 510640
基金项目:农业部公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303103,201503123)和广东省科技计划项目(2016A020210035,2014B090904068)资助
摘    要:以释放期为60~90 d的控释尿素为试验材料,2015年在广东省台山市和翁源县开展大田试验,研究在全量施氮195 kg(N)·hm~(-2)]、减氮20%156 kg(N)·hm~(-2)]和减氮40%117 kg(N)·hm~(-2)]条件下,常规分次施肥(CF)、配施控释尿素氮占25%一次性施用(25%CRU)和配施控释尿素氮占50%一次性施用(50%CRU)对水稻生长、产量及氮肥利用率的影响,为控释尿素在水稻生产上的推广应用提供参考。结果表明,在水稻营养生长阶段,不同施氮处理的每兜分蘖数基本一致,叶片SPAD值随施氮量增加略有提高。随着施氮量增加,水稻产量先提高后降低,当施氮量为156 kg(N)·hm~(-2)时,水稻产量最高。等氮条件下,25%CRU、50%CRU和CF处理的水稻籽粒产量基本一致;不同施氮处理的稻谷和稻草氮素吸收累积量无显著差异。水稻氮素吸收累积量随着施氮量的增加而增加,而氮肥偏生产力和氮收获指数逐渐降低。等氮条件下,25%CRU和50%CRU处理的氮肥农学效率、氮肥生理利用率均显著高于常规施肥处理(P(27)0.05),两地平均增幅分别为14.99%、17.23%和98.22%、57.44%。当施氮量为195 kg(N)·hm~(-2)时,25%CRU和50%CRU处理的氮收获指数较常规施肥处理(CF)提高6.99%和6.69%,其中台山试验点的增幅达到显著水平(P(27)0.05)。117 kg(N)·hm~(-2)处理的土壤碱解氮含量显著降低(P(27)0.05)。25%控释氮肥掺混一次性施用施氮量为156 kg(N)·hm~(-2)的施肥处理,其产量和氮肥利用效率在台山和翁源两个试验点均较高,在广东省双季稻区可实现水稻增产稳产,显著提高氮肥利用率,并维持土壤肥力,是一种较优的氮肥运筹模式。

关 键 词:水稻  控释肥  一次性掺混  减氮  氮肥利用效率  养分吸收  产量
收稿时间:2016/9/17 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/12/28 0:00:00

Effect of combined application of controlled-release urea and conventional urea under reduced N rate on yield and N utilization efficiency of rice
HUANG Qiaoyi,TANG Shuanhu,ZHANG Fabao,ZHANG Mu,HUANG Xu,HUANG Jianfeng,LI Ping and FU Hongting.Effect of combined application of controlled-release urea and conventional urea under reduced N rate on yield and N utilization efficiency of rice[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2017,25(6):829-838.
Authors:HUANG Qiaoyi  TANG Shuanhu  ZHANG Fabao  ZHANG Mu  HUANG Xu  HUANG Jianfeng  LI Ping and FU Hongting
Institution:Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China and Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China
Abstract:The effects of different blending rates of controlled-release urea (CRU) and conventional urea (CU) at different nitrogen (N) application rates on the growth, yield, N uptake and N use efficiency of rice were studied to provide a reference base for the ap-plication and dissemination of CRU in rice production. Field experiments of rice were carried out in Taishan City and Wengyuan County in Guangdong Province during the 2015 rice growing season. Ten treatments were set in the experiment— conventional fertilization with 4 split applications (CF), single basal application of 25% CRU plus 75% CU (25%CRU) and single basal applica-tion of 50% CRU plus 50% CU (50%CRU), respectively, under 100%, 80% and 60% of conventional N rate 195 kg(N)·hm-2, 156 kg(N)·hm-2 and 117 kg(N)·hm-2], and no nitrogen fertilization (CK). Tiller number and leaf SPAD values were measured at vegeta-tive stages of rice. Straw and grain yield were collected at maturity for N analysis. Then yield and yield components were recorded after harvest. The results showed that there was no difference in tiller number at vegetative growth stages under different N fertiliza-tion treatments, and that leaf SPAD increased with increasing N application rate. With increasing N application rate, rice grain yield increased initially and then decreased. Also the highest rice grain yield was obtained under 156 kg(N)·hm-2 treatment. N uptake of rice increased with increasing N application. At the same N rate, no differences was noted in grain yield, N uptake of rice grain and rice straw among CF, 25%CRU and 50%CRU treatments. With increasing N application rate, N partial factor productivity and N harvest index decreased gradually. For the same N rate, agronomic N use efficiency, N physiology efficiency under 25%CRU and 50%CRU treatments were higher than that under CF treatment (P<0.05), with average increases of 14.99%, 17.23% and 98.22%, 57.44%, respectively. N harvest indices under 25%CRU and 50%CRU treatments were averagely higher by 6.99% and 6.69%, re-spectively, than that under CF treatment at conventional application rate 195 kg(N)·hm-2], especially in Taishan City. Soil available N under 60% conventional N rate 117 kg(N)·hm–2] treatment after rice harvest was significantly lower than that under 100% and 80% conventional N rate treatments. In conclusion, rice grain yield and N use efficiency under 25%CRU at 80% conventional N rate in both experiment sites were superior over those under other treatments. Therefore, single basal application of 25%CRU plus 75%CU with N rate of 156 kg(N)hm-2 increased rice yield and N use efficiency, and maintained soil N fertility in Guangdong. This was a potential beneficial and rational N application mode for the region.
Keywords:Rice  Controlled-release urea  Basal-blending application  Low nitrogen application  Nitrogen use efficiency  Nutrient uptake  Yield
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国生态农业学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国生态农业学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号