首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Paraoxonase activity as a tool for clinical monitoring of dogs treated for canine leishmaniasis
Authors:G. Rossi  F. Ibba  S. Meazzi  A. Giordano  S. Paltrinieri
Affiliation:1. Department of Veterinary Science and Public Health, University of Milan, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy;2. Veterinary Laboratory, Poggio dei Pini, 09012 Capoterra, Cagliari, Italy;3. Clinical Pathology Unit, Central Laboratory, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Milan, Via dell’Università 6, 26900 Lodi, Italy;1. Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA;2. Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA;3. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA;1. School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil;2. College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Department of Molecular Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA;1. Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison St., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA;2. Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, 625 Harrison St., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Abstract:This study was designed to determine if the activity of paraoxonase (PON1), an antioxidant enzyme that works as a negative acute phase reactant, is a better predictor for the clinical recovery of leishmaniotic dogs receiving standard treatments compared with inflammatory markers such as C reactive protein (CRP) and electrophoretic fractions. For this purpose we tested 20 healthy dogs (controls) and 39 leishmaniotic dogs classified as sick (group A, n = 23) or severely sick (group B, n = 16) and tested at admission and after 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days.At admission, CRP and electrophoresis were altered in both groups, while PON1 activity was abnormal only in group B. There were no differences related to the outcome (mortality, complications or time of recovery). PON1 activity normalized in about 2 weeks in dogs that had abnormal values at admission and a final positive outcome; CRP normalized in 4–6 weeks and electrophoretic fractions were still altered after 6 weeks. The results show that, at admission, inflammatory markers did not predict the outcome of leishmaniasis. PON1 activity decreased only in some dogs with systemic inflammation but not in those with mild leishmaniasis: when decreased, PON1 normalized earlier than other markers in dogs that responded to treatment. This finding most likely depends on the rapid decrease in oxidative phenomena. PON1 activity should therefore be tested on admission: if low values are recorded, severe inflammation may be suspected and PON1 measurement may be repeated during treatment to early identify responsive dogs.
Keywords:Canine leishmaniasis  Paraoxonase 1 (PON1)  Clinical monitoring  Acute phase protein  Electrophoresis
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号