首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

河西地区滴灌春玉米对不同灌溉决策方法的响应
引用本文:杨睿,范军亮,赖珍林,许新宇.河西地区滴灌春玉米对不同灌溉决策方法的响应[J].排灌机械工程学报,2022,40(9):966-972.
作者姓名:杨睿  范军亮  赖珍林  许新宇
作者单位:西北农林科技大学旱区农业水土工程教育部重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌 712100
摘    要:基于3种灌溉决策方法(土壤水分、蒸散量、土水势),设置10个灌溉处理(CK,W1,W2,EP100,EP80,EF100,EF80,P25,P45,P65),研究不同灌溉决策方法对河西地区春玉米生长、产量及水分利用效率WUE的影响.结果表明:基于土壤水分、蒸散量、土水势调控灌溉下产量最高的处理分别为CK,EP100和P25;处理CK的产量比EP100和P25分别增大6.90%和8.28%.CK的春玉米生长和干物质积累最优,但是耗水量最大,为718.54 mm,比EP100增大26.13%和11.57%.处理EP100的产量显著低于CK,但WUE显著高于CK.处理P25较CK和E P100灌水次数多,产量和水分利用效率表现均不突出.处理EP80和EP100的产量和WUE差异不具有统计学意义.综合考虑产量、水分利用效率和灌溉决策方法的适用性,基于过去蒸散量调控灌溉,每周灌水定额为80%ET0(EP80)是最适合河西地区春玉米高效稳产的灌溉决策方法.

关 键 词:春玉米  灌溉决策  生长指标  产量  水分利用  
收稿时间:2021-04-28

Response of drip-irrigated spring maize to different irrigation decision-making methods in Hexi region
YANG Rui,FAN Junliang,LAI Zhenlin,XU Xinyu.Response of drip-irrigated spring maize to different irrigation decision-making methods in Hexi region[J].Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering,2022,40(9):966-972.
Authors:YANG Rui  FAN Junliang  LAI Zhenlin  XU Xinyu
Institution:Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
Abstract:Based on three irrigation decision-making methods(soil moisture, evapotranspiration, soil water potential), ten irrigation treatments(CK,W1,W2,EP100,EP80,EF100,EF80,P25,P45,P65)were designed to study the effects of different irrigation decision-making methods on the growth, grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize. The results showed that the highest grain yield was obtained by CK, EP100 and P25 under the soil moisture, evapotranspiration and soil water potential based irrigation methods, respectively. The yield of CK was 6.90% and 8.28% higher than that of EP100 and P25, respectively. The growth and dry matter accumulation of spring maize were highest under CK, but its water consumption was largest(718.54 mm), which was 26.13% and 11.57% higher than that of EP100 and P25, respectively. The yield of EP100 was significantly lower than that of CK, while its water use efficiency was significantly higher than that of CK. The P25 treatment had irrigation times than CK and E100 treatments, and its performances in yield and water use efficiency were not outstanding. There was no significant difference in maize yield and water use efficiency between EP80 and EP100. Comprehensively considering the yield, water use efficiency, and the applicability of the methods, it was believed that the irrigation decision-making method based on past evapotranspiration with weekly irrigation quota of 80%ET0(EP80)was the most suitable irrigation decision-making method for efficient and stable spring maize production in the Hexi Region.
Keywords:spring maize  irrigation decision  growth index  yield  water utilization  
点击此处可从《排灌机械工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《排灌机械工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号