首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

祁连山国家公园生态承载力年际变化特征及其影响因素分析
引用本文:单姝瑶,徐浩杰,杨磊,齐效镰,陈甜,陈生云,高雅月. 祁连山国家公园生态承载力年际变化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2191-2198. DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.08.031
作者姓名:单姝瑶  徐浩杰  杨磊  齐效镰  陈甜  陈生云  高雅月
作者单位:1. 兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室/兰州大学农业农村部草牧业创新重点实验室/兰州大学草地农业教育部工程 研究中心/兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 甘肃 兰州 730020;2. 疏勒河源冰冻圈与生态环境综合监测研究站/冰冻圈科学国家 重点实验室/中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;3. 祁连山国家公园国家长期科研基地, 青海 西宁 810000
基金项目:青海省重点研发与转化计划项目(2020-SF-146);国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41901113);甘肃省青年科技基金计划项目(20JR5RA232)资助
摘    要:基于2000—2019年祁连山国家公园境内的卫星遥感和社会经济统计数据,综合运用DPSIR、TOPSIS和障碍度模型,构建生态承载力评价指标体系,分析生态承载力年际变化特征,量化生态承载力状况,揭示影响生态承载力的主要障碍因素。结果表明:研究时段内生态承载力状况较差,经济发展与生态环境保护矛盾突出。2000—2014年生态承载力降低,2014—2019年生态承载力增加。驱动力和压力子系统变化是导致2014年之前生态承载力降低的主要因素,2014年以后生态承载力增加是驱动力、压力和响应子系统共同作用的结果。响应子系统是影响现阶段生态承载力的主要障碍因素,其次是驱动力和压力子系统。随时间推移,响应子系统对生态承载力的影响减弱,驱动力子系统对生态承载力的影响增强。未来应将国家公园纳入区域发展,耦合协调生态环境保护与社会经济发展的关系。

关 键 词:DPSIR模型  贴近度  障碍度  趋势分析  驱动力  
收稿时间:2022-03-15

Inter-annual Variation of Ecological Carrying Capacity and Its Controlling Factors in Qilian Mountain National Park
SHAN Shu-yao,XU Hao-jie,Yang Lei,Qi Xiao-lian,CHEN Tian,CHEN Sheng-yun,GAO Ya-yue. Inter-annual Variation of Ecological Carrying Capacity and Its Controlling Factors in Qilian Mountain National Park[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2191-2198. DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.08.031
Authors:SHAN Shu-yao  XU Hao-jie  Yang Lei  Qi Xiao-lian  CHEN Tian  CHEN Sheng-yun  GAO Ya-yue
Abstract:Based on the satellite remote sensing and socio-economic statistical data of Qilian Mountain National Park from 2000 to 2019,as well as the DPSIR,TOPSIS and obstacle degree models,this study built an assessment indicator system for ecological carrying capacity (ECC). We also investigated the inter-annual variation and the status of ECC. The dominant obstacle factors for ECC were examined. The results showed that the overall status of ECC was relatively poor during the study period,suggesting that the contradiction between economic development and eco-environment protection was manifest. ECC decreased from 2000 to 2014 and then increased afterwards. Driving force and pressure subsystems were the dominant factors for ECC decline before 2014. Nevertheless,the increase of ECC after 2014 was caused by the changes of driving force,pressure and response subsystems. The response subsystem was the main obstacle factor that affected ECC dynamics,followed by driving force and pressure subsystems. Influence of the response subsystem on ECC decreased over time,but an increasing impact of the driving force subsystem on ECC occurred. It is suggested that Qilian Mountain National Park should be included in future regional development to build a harmonious relationship between eco-environment protection and socioeconomic development.
Keywords:DPSIR model  Closeness degree  Obstacle degree  Trend analysis  Driving force  
点击此处可从《草地学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《草地学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号