Poor regulatory capacity limits the ability of science to influence the management of mahogany |
| |
Authors: | Arthur G. Blundell Raymond E. Gullison |
| |
Affiliation: | a American Association for the Advancement of Science-Diplomacy Fellow, USAID Forest Team, 3426 16th St NW #308, Washington, DC 20010, USA;b Centre for Biodiversity Research, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 |
| |
Abstract: | Decades of research have had virtually no impact on harvesting rates or harvesting practices for mahogany (Swietenia spp.), among the most valuable timber species of Latin America. Despite the existence of science-based regulations, mahogany is rapidly and often illegally harvested to the point where its density is so depleted that logging is no longer commercially viable. The lack of influence of science on forest management is not a result of scientific deficiency; rather, it is a political and economic failure to implement existing forest management policies. Until political will and regulatory capacity for enforcement exist or until buyers insist on meaningful verification that shipments were legally obtained, there is little incentive for reform and policies regulating the use of mahogany will not be implemented. Thus, under present conditions, there is little opportunity for science to influence the fate of mahogany. The case study of mahogany provides an excellent example not only of the difficulty for research to inform forest management, but also of demonstrating the key elements necessary for effective implementation of any forest policy. |
| |
Keywords: | Certification Chain-of-custody Consumer choice Latin America Neotropics Swietenia macrophylla Meliaceae Illegal logging Forest product |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|