An effective approach to sustainable small-scale irrigation developments in Sub-Saharan Africa

Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) that depend on foreign aid once political independence is gained, continue to be affected by changing aid modalities led by aid communities. It has been claimed that previous irrigation programs in SSA have not improved agricultural production as expected, and that the budget for implementation of further irrigation development has then been decreased. As a result, small-scale operations, which are part of participatory integrated rural development (PIRD), have become mainstream in the implementation of irrigation development in SSA. A small-scale irrigation development (SSID) was considered capable of attracting initial investment, required shorter construction periods, was comparatively easy to design, farmers were able to maintain the system themselves, and it had a lesser environmental impact. In general, to achieve a sustainable irrigation scheme, three systems must be established: a “water utilization system”; an “operation and maintenance (O&M) system”; and a “succession system”. This paper discusses SSID in SSA with regard to a number of important factors, i.e., environmental, economic, and social factors, all of which impact on the sustainability of SSID. The progress of low-input, effective, and sustainable irrigation development (LESID) and the impact of changing aid modalities is followed in three countries, Ghana, Malawi, and Tanzania. In addition, the future effective implementation of SSID by way of LESID in other SSA countries is discussed. A self-supported SSID (as employed in Malawi) is currently considered the most appropriate LESID for least developed countries (LDCs) in SSA.