首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Contingent Valuation of Woodland-Owner Private Amenities in Spain,Portugal, and California
Authors:Pablo Campos  Jose L Oviedo  Alejandro Caparrós  Lynn Huntsinger  Inocencio Coelho
Institution:1. Research Professor, Institute for Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 28037 Madrid, Spain;2. Assistant Research Professor, Institute for Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 28037 Madrid, Spain;3. Associate Research Professor, Institute for Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 28037 Madrid, Spain;4. Professor, Department of Environmental, Science, Policy and Management (ESPM), University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;5. Senior Researcher, National Institute of Biological Resources, 2005-058 Santarém, Portugal;1. Transplant Immunology Unit, Division of Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland;2. Division of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland;3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine Specialties, University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland;4. Service of Internal Medicine, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Abstract:Most of the Mediterranean woodlands in Spain, Portugal, and California are managed as agrosilvopastoral enterprises, producing some combination of livestock, wood, cork products, and crops, as well as wildlife habitat and diverse environmental services. Private amenity benefits to landowners have been suggested as an explanation for high land prices and the persistence of such rangeland enterprises despite apparently marginal cash returns. In this study, private amenity values are estimated using a contingent valuation technique in surveys of private woodland owners as part of five case studies, using a design developed to separate landowner amenity income and capital values. Nonindustrial private landowners were asked about the maximum amount of money that they were willing to give up (to pay) before selling their property to invest in more commercially profitable assets, and the proportion of the market price of their woodland that they think is explained by privately consumed amenities. Amenity values were found to be relevant because, in all cases, landowners were willing to pay &spigt; €120 · ha-1 · yr-1, at 2002 prices, and attributed &spigt; 30% of land market price to amenities. These values represent an amenity profitability rate &spigt; 2% in all case studies. The data analysis shows some similarities, but mostly divergences, in the different land-simulated and amenity-simulated markets.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号