Comparison of Fine-Needle Aspiration and Surgical-Tissue Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Canine Brain Tumors

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnoses obtained using fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and surgical-tissue biopsy of focal cerebral masses with the histologic diagnoses obtained via necropsy. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective case series. SAMPLE POPULATION: Ten client-owned adult dogs of various breeds. All dogs had clinical signs of cerebral disease and had a focal brain mass identified using magnetic resonance imaging; all were eventually euthanatized. METHODS: Immediately after euthanasia, the brains were removed en bloc from the cranial cavity. FNAs were obtained from each mass using a 22-gauge hypodermic needle and a 12-mL syringe. Cytologic preparations were made from each aspirate. A 14-gauge Tru-cut biopsy needle was used to obtain a core tissue sample from each mass. The biopsy specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and submitted for histologic evaluation. The brains were similarly fixed and stained. Six-micrometer-thick transverse sections of the brain were examined microscopically. RESULTS: Neoplasia was confirmed in all dogs histologically in the 6-microm transverse sections. Four meningiomas, 2 astrocytomas, 2 oligodendrogliomas, 1 pituitary adenocarcinoma, and 1 neurofibrosarcoma were identified. FNA correctly identified all of the masses as neoplastic. Cytologic diagnoses correlated with the histologic interpretation in 5 of the masses (50%). Tru-cut biopsy specimens identified all 10 masses as neoplastic; in 9 of the 10 (90%), the diagnosis correlated with the histologic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: FNA is a sensitive method that can be used to determine the presence of neoplasia in the brain, but is not as definitive as the Tru-cut biopsy in determining the specific type of cerebral neoplasm.