Expression of blood hepatocyte-derived microRNA-122 in canine multicentric lymphoma with hepatic involvement

Veterinary Research Communications - This study was performed to evaluate the hepatocyte-derived microRNA (miR)-122 as novel diagnostic biomarker in canine lymphoma. Fifteen dogs were enrolled in...     

CLINICAL AND ULTRASONOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SALIVARY MUCOCELES IN 13 DOGS

Salivary mucocele is one of the causes of submandibular swelling in dogs and is due to a collection of mucoid saliva that has leaked from a damaged salivary gland. The purpose of this case series report was to describe the clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics of confirmed salivary mucoceles in 13 dogs admitted to the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at Cairo University. The final diagnosis of salivary mucocele was based on aspirate cytology for all dogs and additional surgical excision for seven dogs. For dogs admitted from 2 weeks to 1 month from the onset of clinical signs, the cervical mucocele appeared as a round echogenic structure with a large volume of central anechoic content. The wall was a clearly identified hyperechoic structure surrounding the gland. For dogs admitted between 1 to 2 months from the onset of clinical signs, the volume of anechoic material appeared less than that seen in the acute cases. The overall appearance of the salivary mucocele was heterogenous. For dogs admitted after 2 months from the onset of clinical signs, the salivary mucocele appeared grainy or mottled, with a heterogenous appearance and a further decrease in anechoic content. For one dog that presented after 3 months from the onset of clinical signs, the salivary mucocele was hard on palpation and appeared hyperechoic with distal acoustic shadowing. Findings from this study indicated that ultrasonographic characteristics of salivary mucoceles in dogs vary depending on the chronological stage of the disease.     

Ultrasonography and surgical management of a perineal hernia in a donkey

This case report records a unilateral perineal hernia in a 7-year-old female donkey. The donkey had a history of unilateral swelling lateral to the left vulvar lip and difficulty in defaecation. Upon palpation, the swelling was painless, soft and reducible. Ultrasonography revealed a hyperechoic hernia sac containing dilated nonmotile bowel with homogenous hypoechoic contents. Primary herniorrhaphy was performed after repositioning of the herniated bowel. The donkey made an uneventful recovery with no recurrence or complications for 6 months of available follow-up. In conclusion, perineal hernia should be considered in the differential diagnosis of perineal swellings in donkeys. Clinical examination, ultrasonography and surgical exploration are valuable for definite diagnosis of perineal hernia in donkeys. Surgical herniorrhaphy was successful in correcting the problem in this case.