排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
A. M. O’Connor J. M. Sargeant I. A. Gardner J. S. Dickson M. E. Torrence Consensus Meeting Participants C. E. Dewey I. R. Dohoo R. B. Evans J. T. Gray M. Greiner G. Keefe S. L. Lefebvre P. S. Morley A. Ramirez W. Sischo D. R. Smith K. Snedeker J. Sofos M. P. Ward R. Wills 《Zoonoses and public health》2010,57(2):95-104
The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health and food‐safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A 2‐day consensus meeting was held on 18–19 November 2008 in Chicago, IL, USA, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web‐based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food‐safety researchers, livestock‐production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web‐based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety and 22‐item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist and an additional sub‐item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health and food‐safety outcomes. 相似文献
2.
3.
Niko?Balkenhol Felix?Gugerli Sam?A.?Cushman Lisette?P.?Waits Aurélie?Coulon J.?W.?Arntzen Rolf?Holderegger Helene?H.?Wagner Participants of the Landscape Genetics Research Agenda Workshop 《Landscape Ecology》2009,24(4):455-463
Landscape genetics is an emerging interdisciplinary field that combines methods and concepts from population genetics, landscape
ecology, and spatial statistics. The interest in landscape genetics is steadily increasing, and the field is evolving rapidly.
We here outline four major challenges for future landscape genetic research that were identified during an international landscape
genetics workshop. These challenges include (1) the identification of appropriate spatial and temporal scales; (2) current
analytical limitations; (3) the expansion of the current focus in landscape genetics; and (4) interdisciplinary communication
and education. Addressing these research challenges will greatly improve landscape genetic applications, and positively contribute
to the future growth of this promising field.
Participants of the Landscape Genetics Research Agenda Workshop, held at the 2007 World Congress of the International Association
of Landscape Ecologists (IALE), in Wageningen, The Netherlands: Paul Arens, Pascal Campagne, Virginia H. Dale, Alfredo G.
Nicieza, Marinus J. M. Smulders, Edoardo Tedesco, Hongfang Wang, Tzeidle Wasserman. 相似文献
1