排序方式: 共有13条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Roger Paden 《Agriculture and Human Values》1990,7(3-4):70-79
Many philosophers and environmentalists have advocated the development of a revolutionary new moral paradigm that treats natural objects as “morally considerable” in-themselves, independently of their relation to human beings. Often it is claimed that we need to develop a radically new theory of value to underpin this new paradigm. In this paper, I argue against this position and in favor of a more critical approach to environmental ethics. Such a critical approach, I believe, is not only more politically sound, but it is not open to the kinds of objections that afflict “biocentric moral theories” that depend on a conception of the intrinsic worth of nature. In the first sections of the paper, I develop a set of these criticism. In the last part of the paper, I turn to examine the advantages of a critical approach to environmental ethics. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Conner Bailey Mike Skaldany Roger Paden Ronnie Hawkins Tony Smith 《Agriculture and Human Values》1990,7(2):105-116
Conner Bailey is Associate Professor of Rural Sociology at Auburn University. Mike Skladany is a doctoral student in Sociology at Michigan State University. Both have extensive field experience in Southeast Asia with fisheries and other common property natural resource systems. 相似文献
10.