Comparison of the results of soil profiles’ diagnostics performed in three classification systems

Three soil classification systems—the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB), Soil Taxonomy, and the recent Russian system—were used for the identification of 17 soil profiles in southwestern Poland; all the systems put emphasis on the soil properties as diagnostic criteria. Different soils developed on glaciofluvial plains, loessic uplands, and in the Sudetes Mountains were classified. The best correlation between the classification decisions in the different systems was obtained for the most widespread soils owing to the similarity of the diagnostic criteria, which were essentially close although not coinciding. The most prominent divergence between the systems in both the names and the taxonomic categories of the soils was found for the polygenetic soils and for the soils developing from the lithologically discontinuous parent materials. It was also found that the diagnostic elements differ in terms of their taxonomic importance among the classification systems.     

Valentin Dmitrievich Tonkonogov is seventy

Jubilees

Valentin Dmitrievich Tonkonogov is seventy     

Russian Soil Classification System: Towards the Next Approximation

Eurasian Soil Science - The current status of soil classification in Russia is considered: its usage; difference among variants of 1997, 2004, and 2008; and reasons, means, and methods for its...     

Orders in the soil classification system of Russia: Taxonomic distance as a measure of their adequate identification

Taxonomic distances between pairs of soil orders in the Russian soil classification system have been calculated using a methodology suggested for calculation of taxonomic distances between the Reference Soil Groups in the international soil classification system (WRB). Basing on the data obtained, some proposals for the development of the Russian soil classification system have been formulated. Most of the orders are characterized by considerable taxonomic distances between them, and their identification in the classification system is doubtless. Small taxonomic distances are characteristic of the following pairs of orders: organo-accumulative and structural-metamorphic soils, hydrometamorphic soils and lithozems, and cryometamorphic and eluvial soils. Therefore, criteria for defining some orders, and/or profile formulas for some soil types composing the orders may be revised. The comparison of taxonomic distances between soil orders in the Russian system and between Reference Soil Groups in the international system allows us to suggest their certain similarity.     

Small-scale soil maps and the scientific heritage of N.N. Rozov

The comparative analysis of small-scale maps of the USSR has revealed the characteristics of their contents, concepts, and ways of compilation and cartographic representation. The facies-zonal concept is reflected both in the map legends and the patterns of the mapping units. The differences between the maps reflect the time of their creation: the degree of knowledge on the soils, the contribution of the geographic forecast, and the objective of the maps and their scale. Especial importance in soil cartography and geographic education belongs to the map of 1954 compiled by Rozov. Forty years later, it was replaced by a map of similar purpose, scale, and mapped area. This map was compiled at the Faculty of Geography (Moscow State University), and it has inherited many features of its predecessor—the map of Rozov.     

Ecological niches of major soil types in Russia: Geographical aspects of the new Russian soil classification system

The factors of soil formation are not directly taken into account in the new profile-genetic Russian soil classification system; they are not reflected in the names and diagnostics of the soils. At the same time, as well as in many other modern soil classification systems, including the American Soil Taxonomy and the WRB system, the choice of the diagnostic criteria, the establishment of the relationships between them, and the setting of the quantitative boundaries between the soil taxa are based on our perception of soil geneses with due account for the factors of soil formation. In contrast to the ecological-genetic soil classification system of 1977, information on the factors of soil formation in the new system is encoded in the properties of the soil horizons. In some cases, this is insufficient for the definite geographic localization of soils and complicates the practical application of the new classification system. In this context, information on the ecological niches of soil types was included in the field manual on soil correlation-an abridged version of the soil classification system published in 2008—in the form of special tables developed for native and agrogenic soils. The analysis of these tables made it possible to outline certain geographic regularities in the distribution of soil types belonging to the trunk of postlithogenic soils.     

Soil-genetic zoning: Principles, goals, structure, and applications

The soil-genetic zoning proposed, unlike the known scheme of soil-genetic zoning, is based on the analysis of soil properties and soil-forming processes. Its objective is to interpret the soil cover in the format of the substantive-genetic soil classification of Russia (2004). The units of the soil-genetic zoning are distinguished according to the manifestations of horizon-forming processes: the main processes determining the principal trend of pedogenesis and the soil profile composition at the first level and the additional processes (forming the associated soils) serving as criteria for distinguishing the units at the second level. The results obtained allow considering this investigation as an experience of a new interpretation of a small-scale soil map and its analysis from two positions: the geography of the soil-forming processes and the complexity of the soil cover. The soil-genetic zoning has been carried out on the basis of the State Soil Map sheets; it can be an instrument for the conversion of the map??s contents into the substantive-genetic soil classification of Russia (2004).     

Soil formation in Greyzems in Moscow district: micromorphology, chemistry, clay mineralogy and particle size distribution

Greyzems (Grey Forest Soils) are zonal soils of the forest–steppe, in Russia geographically situated between the (Podzo) Luvisols of the southern taiga forest and the (Luvic) Chernozems of the steppe. Greyzems are characterized by a dark mollic horizon, with uncoated (bleached) silt and sand grains on pedfaces, and an argic horizon as diagnostic horizons. The FAO–Unesco soil map of the world shows Greyzems and Luvisols in Russia at this transition (the Russian soil map shows only Greyzems), while in similar geographic position in the USA and Canada the proportion of Greyzems is very small and Luvic Phaeozems/Chernozems and Albic Luvisols occupy those transitional zones of the grassland–forest interface. Three Greyzem profiles, presently under forest, and developed on loess-like mantle loams of Late Weichselian (Valday) age in the northern forest–steppe zone of the East European plain (Middle Russian Upland) were described and sampled near Pushchino, some 100 km south of Moscow. Micromorphology, particle size data, chemical data and clay mineralogy were studied. Based on the particle size distribution and the occurrence of fragments of a second humus horizon (SHH) the presence of two, rather similar, deposits in the solum is advocated. The following processes have been deduced from the study: (i) decalcification and secondary accumulation of carbonates; (ii) humus accumulation, including the significance of the SHH; (iii) clay illuviation, presumably two main phases; (iv) biological activity; (v) degradation of the mollic A: occurrence of bleached grains; (vi) downward migration of textural components and organic matter, in the Bt horizon along major pedfaces: occurrence of black organo-clay coatings and uncoated silt/sand grains; (vii) gleying. The tentative sequence of these processes during Late Weichselian and Holocene times leads us to conclude that Greyzems are polygenetic. They formed as Podzo(Luvisols) under forest, with fine clay coatings in the fine pores inside the blocky and prismatic peds, in the Late Glacial and Early Holocene. The change to tall grass steppe in the Atlanticum created a mollic horizon, that degrades when forest re-invades during the Subatlanticum. Fine clay, combined with organic matter forms black coatings on the major pedfaces. Uncoated silt and sand particles also migrate downward along those major pedfaces. Biological activity is involved in the very complex pattern of the transitional AhE and EBt horizons. Active gleying only occurs in the profile on the lowest topographic position. These latter processes are still active today. Similar soils do occur in the grassland–forest interface in North America, except where the younger age of the landscape and high CaCO3 content at shallow depth prevented their full development.