首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   3篇
  免费   0篇
农学   1篇
农作物   2篇
  2022年   1篇
  2007年   2篇
排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Euphytica - The hard-shelled character of ordinary cultivated Tartary buckwheat has become a factor influencing its taste and nutritional efficacy. However, the local variety, Rice-Tartary, can...  相似文献   
2.
Maize canopies with a synchronous seedling emergence and a uniform plant spatial distribution exhibit early-established plant hierarchies (at the 4-leaf stage; V4). The dominant and dominated individuals of the stand differ in plant growth rate during both the pre-silking period (i.e. from V7 to V13; PGRPS) and the period around silking (i.e. a 30 d period centered in silking; PGRS), and in the ear growth rate around silking (EGRS). Based on the depleted availability of assimilates of the dominated plants, we tested the hypotheses that (i) the low PGRPS of dominated individuals affects the morphogenesis of the apical ear leading to a low number of completely developed flowers per ear, and (ii) the low EGRS of dominated individuals results in a pronounced asynchrony of flowering dynamics and uneven silk exsertion from the husks. Two hybrids with contrasting tolerance to crowding stress (DK752 and DK765 as the tolerant and the intolerant hybrid, respectively) were cropped under different intensities of interplant competition (6, 12, 12 plants m−2 thinned to 6 plants m−2 at V9 and 6 plants m−2 shaded from V9 onwards) during 2004/2005 and at 12 plants m−2 during 2005/2006 at Pergamino (34°56′S 60°34′W), Argentina. Dominant plants were the individuals of the stands with the highest PGRPS (ca. 1.72 and 2.56 g d−1 for dominated and dominant plants, respectively), PGRS (ca. 3.05 and 3.94 g d−1 for dominated and dominant plants, respectively) and EGRS (ca. 1.06 and 1.55 g d−1 for dominated and dominant plants, respectively). This plant type also exhibited the most synchronous flowering dynamics (anthesis–silking interval ca. 1.49 and 1.15 days for dominated and dominant plants, respectively) and the highest kernel set (ca. 401 and 572 kernels plant−1 for dominated and dominant plants, respectively). Apical ears of dominated plants exhibited a delayed in the rate of progress to successive floral stages, but the final number of completely developed flowers per ear did not differ between extreme plant types (ca. 967 and 803 completely developed flowers per ear for DK752 and DK765, respectively). Hence, kernel number per plant was not limited by the number of completely developed flowers per ear, but flowering dynamics were a decisive factor in kernel set of both plant types. Asynchronous silking within the ear of dominated plants determined a greater proportion of flowers per ear with non-exposed silks on silking + 5 d and a larger asynchrony in silk extrusion within the ear. These responses increased kernel abortion rate respect to figures obtained for dominant individuals.  相似文献   
3.
Early interferences among plants within a maize stand determine the establishment of extreme plant types (i.e. dominant and dominated individuals). The development of these hierarchies takes place well before [from the seventh leaf stage (V7) onwards] the start of the critical period for kernel set (i.e. a 30-day period centered in silking). Kernel number per plant (KNP) is significantly related to plant growth rate around silking (PGRS) and biomass partitioning to the ear during this period. Previous evidence has demonstrated that at high stand densities, extreme plant types may exhibit similar PGRS values but set different KNP. We tested the hypothesis that early established plant hierarchies differ in biomass allocation to the ears during the period around silking. Two hybrids of contrasting tolerance to crowding (DK752 and DK765 as the tolerant and the intolerant hybrid, respectively) were cropped at different interplant competition intensities (6, 12, 12 pl m−2 thinned to 6 pl m−2 at V9 and 6 pl m−2 shading from V9 onwards) during 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 in Argentina. For all treatments, the coefficient of variation (CV) of plant biomass increased from V3 (ca. 1.2%) to V9-10 (ca. 22%). From V7 onwards, plant growth rate of dominant individuals was higher (P < 0.05) than that of the dominated plants. Hence, dominant plants exhibited higher (P < 0.05) PGRS (ca. 4.5 g pl day−1) than dominated individuals (ca. 3.7 g pl day−1). As PGRS declined in response to increased plant population density (ca. 5.1 and 2.8 for 6 and 12 pl m−2, respectively), biomass partitioning to the ear was reduced (ca. 0.44 and 0.33 for 6 and 12 pl m−2, respectively). For all treatments, however, dominant plants exhibited a greater biomass partitioning to the ear (ca. 0.41) than the dominated individuals (ca. 0.36). Consequently, the former were the individuals with the highest ear growth rate (ca. 1.9 and 1.4 g per ear per day for the dominant and dominated plant, respectively) and KNP (ca. 623 and 490 kernels per plant for the dominant and dominated plant, respectively) of the stand. We identified three traits on DK765 related to the low tolerance to high-density stress of this genotype: (i) a higher plant-to-plant variability (CV ca. 26% and 19%, for DK765 and DK752, respectively), (ii) a lower biomass partitioning to the ear around silking (ca. 0.26 and 0.39 for DK765 and DK752, respectively), and (iii) a higher response rate of KNP to ear growth rate around silking (ca. 370–738 and 360–414 kernels per g, for DK765 and DK752, respectively). Hence, as stand density was increased, KNP of DK765 was sharply reduced, especially in the dominated individuals of the stand.  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号