排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Agus Cahyono Karyanto Oka Kita Satoshi Haibara Kikuo Toda Hiroto Hardiwinoto Suryo Supriyo Haryono Na'iem Mohamad Wardana Wahyu Sipayung Maurit S. Khomsatun Wijoyo Suhartono 《New Forests》2004,28(2-3):277-285
New Forests - Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) requires information on plant growth and nutrient dynamics in forest ecosystems. To obtain fundamental information for SFM in short-rotation... 相似文献
2.
Hendrien Beukema Finn Danielsen Grégoire Vincent Suryo Hardiwinoto Jelte van Andel 《Agroforestry Systems》2007,70(3):217-242
Plant and bird diversity in the Indonesian jungle rubber agroforestry system was compared to that in primary forest and rubber
plantations by integrating new and existing data from a lowland rain forest area in Sumatra. Jungle rubber gardens are low-input
rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) agroforests that structurally resemble secondary forest and in which wild species are tolerated by the farmer. As primary
forests have almost completely disappeared from the lowlands of the Sumatra peneplain, our aim was to assess the contribution
of jungle rubber as a land use type to the conservation of plant and bird species, especially those that are associated with
the forest interior of primary and old secondary forest. Species-accumulation curves were compiled for terrestrial and epiphytic
pteridophytes, trees and birds, and for subsets of ‘forest species’ of terrestrial pteridophytes and birds. Comparing jungle
rubber and primary forest, groups differed in relative species richness patterns. Species richness in jungle rubber was slightly
higher (terrestrial pteridophytes), similar (birds) or lower (epiphytic pteridophytes, trees, vascular plants as a whole)
than in primary forest. For subsets of ‘forest species’ of terrestrial pteridophytes and birds, species richness in jungle
rubber was lower than in primary forest. For all groups, species richness in jungle rubber was generally higher than in rubber
plantations. Although species conservation in jungle rubber is limited by management practices and by a slash-and-burn cycle
for replanting of about 40 years, this forest-like land use does support species diversity in an impoverished landscape increasingly
dominated by monoculture plantations. 相似文献
1