排序方式: 共有5条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Desneux Nicolas Han Peng Mansour Ramzi Arn Judit Brvault Thierry Campos Mateus R. Chailleux Anais Guedes Raul N. C. Karimi Javad Konan Kouassi Arthur J. Lavoir Anne-violette Luna Mara G. Perez-Hedo Meritxell Urbaneja Alberto Verheggen Franois J. Zappal Lucia Abbes Khaled Ali Abid Bayram Yunus Cantor Fernando Cuthbertson Andrew G. S. De Vis Raf Erler Fedai Firake Dnyaneshwar M. Haddi Khalid Hajjar M. Jamal Ismoilov Khasan Jaworski Coline C. Kenis Marc Liu Hao-tian Madadi Hossein Martin Thibaud Mazih Ahmed J. Messelink Gerben Mohamed Samira A. Nofemela Robert S. Oke Abiola Ramos Csar Ricupero Michele Roditakis Emmanouil Shashank Pathour R. Wan Fang-Hao Wang Ming-hui Wang Su Zhang Yi-Bo Biondi Antonio 《Journal of pest science》2022,95(1):17-39
Journal of Pest Science - The South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), has invaded most Afro-Eurasian countries and is threatening worldwide tomato... 相似文献
2.
Maria L Pappas Colette Broekgaarden George D Broufas Merijn R Kant Gerben J Messelink Anke Steppuhn Felix Wäckers Nicole M van Dam 《Pest management science》2017,73(9):1780-1788
Biological control is an important ecosystem service delivered by natural enemies. Together with breeding for plant defence, it constitutes one of the most promising alternatives to pesticides for controlling herbivores in sustainable crop production. Especially induced plant defences may be promising targets in plant breeding for resistance against arthropod pests. Because they are activated upon herbivore damage, costs are only incurred when defence is needed. Moreover, they can be more specific than constitutive defences. Nevertheless, inducible defence traits that are harming plant pest organisms may interfere with biological control agents, such as predators and parasitoids. Despite the vast fundamental knowledge on plant defence mechanisms and their effects on natural enemies, our understanding of the feasibility of combining biological control with induced plant defence in practice is relatively poor. In this review, we focus on arthropod pest control and present the most important features of biological control with natural enemies and of induced plant defence. Furthermore, we show potential synergies and conflicts among them and, finally, identify gaps and list opportunities for their combined use in crop protection. We suggest that breeders should focus on inducible resistance traits that are compatible with the natural enemies of arthropod pests, specifically traits that help communities of natural enemies to build up. © 2017 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. 相似文献
3.
Zhang Nina Xiaoning Andringa Joke Brouwer Jitske Alba Juan M. Kortbeek Ruy W. J. Messelink Gerben J. Janssen Arne 《Journal of pest science》2022,95(3):1343-1355
Journal of Pest Science - It has become clear that omnivorous predators can induce plant defences that affect the performance and host plant choice of herbivores. They are also known to induce the... 相似文献
4.
Anaïs Chailleux Emily K Mohl Mickaël Teixeira Alves Gerben J Messelink Nicolas Desneux 《Pest management science》2014,70(12):1769-1779
Understanding how arthropod pests and their natural enemies interact in complex agroecosystems is essential for pest management programmes. Theory predicts that prey sharing a predator, such as a biological control agent, can indirectly reduce each other's density at equilibrium (apparent competition). From this premise, we (i) discuss the complexity of indirect interactions among pests in agroecosystems and highlight the importance of natural enemy‐mediated indirect interactions other than apparent competition, (ii) outline factors that affect the nature of enemy‐mediated indirect interactions in the field and (iii) identify the way to manipulate enemy‐mediated interactions for biological control. We argue that there is a need to increase the link between community ecology theory and biological control to develop better agroecological methods of crop protection via conservation biological control. In conclusion, we identify (i) interventions to be chosen depending on agroecosystem characteristics and (ii) several lines of research that will improve the potential for enemy‐mediated indirect interactions to be applied to biological control. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry 相似文献
5.
1